THE EFFECT OF POSITIVE MARGINS ON OUTCOMES IN BREAST CANCER

Author(s)

Ling CS1;Weisgerber-Kriegl UM*2;Njue A1;Heyes AE1, Kaye JA3 1RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, 3RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To review the data available on excision margins following breast-conserving therapy (BCT), focusing on definitions of positive and clear margins, percentage of operations resulting in positive margins, the effect of positive margins on future treatment, and the relationship between positive margins and disease-free and overall survival.  METHODS: Targeted searches of PubMed were conducted using a predefined search strategy. Data from robust systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses were given priority.  RESULTS: Definitions of positive and negative margins are variable, but typically a clear margin of 2 mm is considered acceptable. Most studies indicate positive margins in 20%-40% of patients after wide local excision. Guidelines recommend that patients with positive margins after BCT undergo repeat surgery, and in surveys, most physicians said they would recommend re-excision when there is tumour within 1 mm of the margin. In the identified studies, 20%-30% of patients underwent re-excision and approximately 2% had multiple re-excisions (two or more); 10%-15% of patients who initially had lumpectomy later had a mastectomy. There is a significant association between margin status and local recurrence (in a recent meta-analysis, the odds ratio was 2.42 for positive vs. negative margin status; 95% confidence interval, 1.94-3.02; P<0.001). However, among patients with a clear margin, width is not clearly related to risk of local recurrence. Four studies that assessed the effect of margin status on overall or disease-specific survival were identified, three reported a significant association (e.g., cause-specific survival at 12 years significantly associated with margin status, P<0.001).  CONCLUSIONS:  Definition of adequate margins remains controversial. None-the-less, final margin status is a key prognostic factor following BCT. The data identified suggest that an intervention that reduces the rates of positive margins during BCT may have the potential to improve outcomes and reduce the burden on patients and health care providers.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PCN16

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×