THE BURDEN OF TREATMENT CHANGE IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER- COMPARISON OF SWITCH VERSUS NON-SWITCH PATIENTS IN THE PERFORM STUDY

Author(s)

Boulenger JP1;Haro JM2;Lamy FX3;Brignone M3;Caillou H4;Rive B3, Saragoussi D*3 1CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France, 2Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 3Lundbeck S.A.S., Issy-les-Moulineaux, France,

OBJECTIVES: PERFORM (Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major depressive disorder) is a 2-year prospective observational cohort study conducted in Europe (France, Germany, Spain, Sweden and UK). Objectives are to describe the functioning of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and factors associated with functional impairment. Here we compare characteristics and outcomes of patients switching antidepressant treatment (ADT) with those initiating ADT at baseline, on an interim 1000-patient dataset. METHODS: Outpatients were recruited from primary or secondary care. Inclusion criteria were: DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of MDD, age 18-65 years, initiation or first switch to an ADT, in monotherapy. In addition to socio-demographics and disease history, data collection included clinician assessments (MADRS and CGI-S) and patient-rated scales evaluating depression (PHQ-9), functioning (SDS), work productivity (WPAI-SHP) and quality of life (QoL - EQ-5D). RESULTS: Of 947 analysable patients at inclusion, 213 (23%) patients were switching (76% for lack of efficacy), versus 716 (77%) initiating ADT. Switchers were slightly older (mean age 46 versus 43 years) and more often female (77% versus 72% women). Switching patients had more severe symptom profiles: more had previous depressive episodes (34% versus 24%) and previous suicide attempts (16% versus 12%). Severity of current episode was greater for switchers (46% versus 36% with a CGI-S score above “markedly ill”; 48% versus 38% with a PHQ-9 score above the severe depression threshold). MADRS scores were similar: 18.1 versus 17.6. QoL was poorer for switchers (EQ-5D: 0.449 versus 0.567), as was overall patient functioning (47% versus 36% with an SDS total score in the highest quartile), while no difference was found for absenteeism (35% versus 34%) and presenteeism (49% versus 50%) (WPAI-SHP). CONCLUSIONS: Patients switching ADT had more severe symptom profiles, lower quality of life and higher functional impairment, compared to non-switching patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PMH13

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×