PATIENTS PREFERENCES REGARDING THE TREATMENT OF TYPE II DIABETES MELLITUS- COMPARISON OF BEST-WORST SCALING AND ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Author(s)

Mühlbacher AC*;Bethge S;Kaczynski A, Juhnke C Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany

OBJECTIVES: There is limited evidence available regarding patient preferences for treatment alternatives, including those treatment characteristics that have greatest influence on the perceived value, and how this knowledge can be used in healthcare decision-making. The objective of this study was to identify and elicit patient preferences for treatments in Type-II-Diabetes in different patient groups. METHODS: In order to elicit patient preferences this study used an explorative qualitative approach in combination with quantitative survey techniques. Literature research and semi-structured interviews (N=15) were the basis of quantitative elicitations (N=388) using Analytic-Hierarchy-Process (AHP) and Best-Worst-Scaling (BWS). The study aimed at the determination of the relative importance of patient-relevant decision criteria as well as to compare two methods of measuring preference. In total, seven therapy-related attributes (three levels each) were tested. The sample contained patients receiving oral anti-diabetics (OAD) (N=200) or insulin (N=188). RESULTS: The qualitative study identified 22 patient-relevant treatment-characteristics. Out of these the seven most important were included in AHP and BWS. The AHP- as well as BWS-surveys resulted in a dominance of the attribute “HbA1c-Level”, for both OAD- and Insulin-patients. In the OAD-group AHP and BWS independently showed the same ranking of the three attributes: “Delay of Insulin-Therapy” (Rank 2), “Occurrence of hypoglycemia” (Rank 3) and “Weight changes” (Rank 4). In the Insulin-group “Occurrence of hypoglycemia” was ranked second using AHP and third within BWS. “Weight changes” were ranked equally in both methods. However their relevance among different patient groups changed. CONCLUSIONS: In both patient-groups AHP and BWS show similar results. Nonetheless both groups have different horizons of experience and differ in the ranking of decision criteria. For the first time the methods of AHP and BWS were used to assess patients’ preferences for different characteristics of treatment in Type-II-Diabetes, as well as the influence of those criteria on the patient benefit.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PDB86

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×