HEAD TO HEAD ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TWO GENOMIC PROFILES OF RECURRENCE RISK FOR BREAST CANCER, MAMMAPRINT VERSUS ONCOTYPE DX, IN SPAIN
Author(s)
Crespo C1;Seguí MÁ2;Cortés J3;Lluch A4;Brosa M5;Becerra V6;Chiavenna SM6, Gracia A*6 1University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2Corporación Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain, 3Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 4Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain, 5Oblikue Consulting, Barcelona, Spain, 6Ferrer Internacional, Barcelona, Spain
OBJECTIVES: Cost effectiveness analysis of MammaPrint in the diagnosis of early breast cancer from the Spanish NHS perspective. METHODS: Markov model assuming a 60-year-old women cohort with negative-lymph node, positive estrogen receptors and negative HER2 breast cancer. Costs and effects of the treatment by identifying recurrence risk using A!O, MammaPrint or OncotypeDX were compared at 5 years, 10 years and lifetime horizons. Probability of low or high risk of recurrence by A!O was fixed 50/50 (ratios between 40/60 and 60/40 for sensitivity analysis). Risks predicted by OncotypeDX and MammaPrint were assumed to be the same. Cost of chemotherapy (2.825€), recurrence (6,357€) and other direct health care costs were derived from local data. Three health states (free of recurrence, recurrence, death) were defined in a given period of time. RESULTS: 31% patients required adjuvant chemotherapy with MammaPrint classification (36.6% with OncotypeDX, 56.3% with A!O). MammaPrint showed a life expectancy of 23.55 years at lifetime Differences in chemotherapy costs, worse prognosis rates and a higher cost of the genomic profile (3,200€ vs. 2,675€) explained higher cumulative costs for OncotypeDX over both alternatives at any time. MammaPrint instead of OncotypeDX showed savings of at least 1,273€ after 5 years. MammaPrint resulted dominant (less costly and more effective) against OncotypeDx at any time horizon and would be cost-effective from the 6th year versus A!O (43,912€, 6,169€ and 287€ per QALY gained at 5, 10 years and lifetime; 30,000€/QALY gained threshold assumed). Sensitivity analysis confirmed base case results with MammaPrint remaining cost-effective until a willingness-to-pay threshold below 275€/QALY gained. Utility of recurrence, age at baseline and probability of A!O low risk were the key drivers at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: MammaPrint in predicting risk of recurrence in these patients and avoiding chemotherapy overtreatment is a dominant strategy over OncotypeDX and it is highly cost-effective against A!O.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin
Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)
Code
PCN139
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology