EVALUATION OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS SIGNALS WITH INCRETIN ENHANCERS- REVISITING DISPROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS OF THE ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM

Author(s)

Ali AK* Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

OBJECTIVES: There has been a rising concern about the association between incretin enhancers and acute pancreatitis (AP). Previous research showed conflicting findings, and this analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) aims at investigating signals of AP across pharmacological classes of anti-diabetes medications (ADM) and within incretin enhancers class. METHODS: Adverse event reports submitted to FAERS between 1997Q3-2012Q1 were analyzed. The outcome was defined by MedDRA Preferred Term (PT) “pancreatitis acute”; exposures were defined by generic names of ADM. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by creating a custom term (CT) for outcome: “autoimmune pancreatitis”, “ischemic pancreatitis”, “pancreatitis”, “pancreatitis acute”, “pancreatitis hemorrhagic”, and “pancreatitis necrotizing”. Reports of other pancreatic disorders were excluded. Disproportionality analysis by proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and 95% confidence interval (LL05-UL95) is applied to detect AP signals compared to all ADM. Associations with LL05≥2 are significant signals. RESULTS: 1,183 AP PT and 4,481 CT reports for ADM were identified (incretin enhancers, n=912 and n=3,704, respectively). Corresponding PRR and (LL05-UL95) were: metformin 0.98 (0.83-1.16) and 0.52 (0.47-0.59); sulfonylureas 0.53 (0.37-0.75) and 0.35 (0.28-0.43); thiazolidinediones 0.12 (0.09-0.16) and 0.12 (0.10-0.14); meglitinides 0.54 (0.31-0.93) and 0.39 (0.28-0.54); incretin enhancers 1.94 (1.87-2.00) and 2.09 (2.06-2.12); and combinations 0.65 (0.47-0.88) and 0.81 (0.70-0.93). Compared to all ADM, estimates for incretin enhancers were: exenatide 1.46 (1.37-1.55) and 1.54 (1.49-1.59); liraglutide 4.90 (4.37-5.48) and 4.00 (2.73-4.28); saxagliptin 4.47 (3.00-6.67) and 4.60 (3.73-5.67); and sitagliptin 2.33 (1.95-2.78) and 4.02 (3.75-4.31). There were no reports of AP PT for linagliptin, but 39 reports of CT with estimates of 6.41 (4.64-8.85) were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other ADM, incretin enhancers are associated with higher than expected reporting of AP. Prescribers should monitor patients with diabetes for signs and symptoms of pancreatitis while treated with incretin enhancers. Given limitations of spontaneous reporting systems, pharmacoepidemiological studies are required to test the generated hypothesis and to draw clinically rigorous conclusions.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PDB1

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×