COSTS COMPARISON OF CUTANEOUS DRUG REACTIONS TREATMENT DIVIDED BY DIAGNOSIS GROUPS

Author(s)

Wisniewska N*1;Szkultecka-Debek M2;Owczarek W1;Paluchowska EB1, Jahnz-Rozyk KM1 1Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland, 2Department of Dermatology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to analyze the total direct costs of treatment of cutaneous drug reactions (CDR) from healthcare provider and public payer perspective divided by diagnosis groups. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively data from 164 patients (57 men, 107 women) hospitalized in the Department of Dermatology, Military Medical Institute in Warsaw (from 2002 to 2012) due to CDR. Total direct costs from the public payer and healthcare provider were calculated for different diagnoses (based on ICD 10 codes). The analysis was based on data derived from the patients’ medical charts, daily medication logs, and cost data provided by the hospital organization and  accounting department. The services paid by National Health Fund (NHF) were grouped based on ICD-10 and DRG system. For the purpose of the analysis the hospitalization costs were calculated based on the prices for medical services established by the NHF on the basis of a contract with the selected health institution. RESULTS: : In the study group 3 CDR groups were identified: J38-severe skin disease (generalized rash) J39-large dermatological diseases (erythema multiforme) J49-gentle dermatological diseases (urticaria). From NHF perspective the most expensive procedure is J 38 – 962 € per patient (1€ = 4.24 PLN), the lower cost is for J39 and J 49 (476€ and 331€ respectively). From healthcare provider’s perspective the total direct costs equal: J38 – 630 €, J 39 – 552 €, J49 – 375€. Differences in costs could be due to high costs of the clinically severe diseases treatment incurred by the provider while according to the NHF, these units are classified as large dermatological diseases and thereby direct treatment costs are much lower than real provider’s costs. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis results suggest taking into consideration reclassification of the services by NHF or better estimation of DRG groups by the public payer.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PSS13

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×