COST OF END OF LIFE PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CANCER PATIENTS- WHERE DOES THE BUDGET GO TO?

Author(s)

Hammerman A*;Greenberg-Dotan S;Battat E, Bitterman H Clalit Health Services Headquarters, Tel-Aviv, Israel

OBJECTIVES: Costs of cancer treatment has received increased attention in the last decade mainly because of the very high expenses on new biological drugs. Total cancer treatment costs vary by tumor type and stage, with the highest costs usually incurring in the last year of life. In this study, we characterized the drugs that have the highest budget-impact in treating cancer patients in Israel, immediately before death. METHODS: Clalit Health Services (CHS), Israel’s largest health-care organization with over 4 million members, serves 52% of the total population.  Using CHS's comprehensive databases, we identified the three leading fatal cancers in 2012. We calculated CHS's acquisition costs for all pharmaceuticals provided to patients in their last three months of life, and extracted the top budget-consuming drugs used during this period.  RESULTS: The leading fatal cancers in 2012 were colorectal (1551 deaths), breast (1273) and lung cancer (1174). The drugs with the highest budget-impact in colorectal cancer patients were (% of total drug-expenditure, # of patients treated (% of the total number of patients)): Cetuximab (20.2%, 38 patients (2.5%)), Bevacizumab (14.6%, 56 patients (3.6%)), Panitumumab (6.6%, 21 patients (1.4%), Fentanyl (6.5%, 278 patients (17.9%)), Irinotecan (4.0%, 77 patients (5.0%)). In breast cancer: Trastuzumab (12.0%, 23 patients (1.8%)), Fulverstant (6.4%, 42 patients (3.3%), Fentanyl (5.9%, 178 patients (14.0%)), Lapatinib (5.5%, 10 patients (0.8%)), Zoledronic acid (4.1%, 59 patients (4.6%)). In lung cancer: Erlotinib (21.4%, 77 patients (6.6%)), Gefitinib (12.8%, 42 patients (3.6%)), Pemetrexed (10.5%, 57 patients (4.9%)), Crizotinib (6.0%, 8 patients (0.7%)), Fentanyl (4.5%, 298 patients (25.4%)). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of the pharmaceutical budget was spent on a relatively small portion of patients who received expensive novel targeted therapies during their last months of life although chances for success were minimal. A much higher portion of patients received palliative treatments for a substantially smaller proportion of the pharmaceutical expenditure.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-11, ISPOR Europe 2013, The Convention Centre Dublin

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PCN196

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×