THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SEMI-ANNUAL SCREENING FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA IN PATIENTS WITH CHORNIC HEPATITIS B
Author(s)
Srisubat A1, Chaiwerawattana A2, Tunsakul S2, Sukarayodhin S2, Apiwanich C2, Sumetchotimaytha W2, Prasitthipayong A2, Jaisathaporn K2, Karalak A2, Thaiyakul A3, Kapol N4, Sribundit N4, Chaiyakunapruk N51Institute of Medical Research and Technology Assessment, Ladprao, BKK, Thailand, 2National Cancer Institute, Rajthevee, BKK, Thailand, 3Institute of Medical Research and Technology Assessment, Phyathai, BKK, Thailand, 4Silpakorn University, Nakorn Pathom , Thailand, 5Center of Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research (CPOR), Phitsanulok, Thailand
OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth cause of dead from cancer worldwide. Hepatitis B virus infection is the important risk of HCC. Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and liver ultrasound had been introduced as semi-annual screening test for HCC in human with hepatitis B surface antigen positive or patients with chronic hepatitis B. However, the cost-effectiveness of this screening is not well defined. Our objective was to explore the cost-effectiveness of semi-annual HCC screening using AFP and liver ultrasound from societal perspective compared with no screening. METHODS: With a Markov model, we simulated the four health states of natural history of HCC which were no HCC state, resectable HCC state, unresectable HCC state and death state with 6-month cycle lenght. The based case decision model was run for male patients with age of 51 that is mean age of screening group. Cost and outcomes were discounted at a 3% annual rate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: For semi-annual HCC screening, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) which compared with no screening was US$14,111 (95%CI US$13,650-US$14,573) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) for male chronic HBV patients. CONCLUSIONS: AFP with liver ultrasound is not cost effective for semi-annual screening HCC in patients with hepatitis B surface antigen positive or patients with chronic hepatitis B, according to the Thai threshold that ICER of cost-effective intervention should not be exceed US$ 9000 per QALY.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2010-05, ISPOR 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 2010)
Code
PCN81
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic