COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NONINVASIVE MAGNETIC RESONANCE DIRECT THROMBUS IMAGING AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR DIAGNOSING DISTAL DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS

Author(s)

Patel V1, McGhan W21The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Proper diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) at the earliest time is very important so that appropriate therapy can be initiated. Ultrasonography is the most widely used diagnostic technique. Noninvasive magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) is a new diagnostic technique that has higher sensitivity and specificity compared to Ultrasonography for distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The objective is to identify the most cost-effective strategy for diagnosis of distal deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: A decision-analysis model was constructed using TreeAge Pro software and analyzed using second-order Monte Carlo simulation technique. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using Bayes’ revision method that utilized sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests along with the pretest probability of developing the disease. Outcomes considered were costs, adverse events and quality of life. Quality-adjusted life years were calculated using life expectancy tables. Where applicable, costs in pounds were converted to US dollars and adjusted through use of Consumer Price Index data from Bureau of Labor Statistics. Net benefit of each strategy was analyzed at different willingness to pay (WTP) thresholds ($0 to $150,000) to determine the most cost-effective strategy. RESULTS: Noninvasive MRI is the optimal strategy for diagnosis of distal DVT at all WTP thresholds greater than $25,000. No diagnosis strategy was the most cost-effective strategy when threshold was below $25,000. Sensitivity analysis showed that noninvasive MRI remained cost-effective even when all costs were varied by 25%. The model results were affected by the sensitivity of the diagnostic tests. CONCLUSIONS: For base-case scenario, noninvasive MRI is the most cost-effective strategy. Considering the cost-effectiveness and the fact that ultrasonography has higher mortality compared to noninvasive MRI, employing noninvasive MRI appears to the optimal strategy. Healthcare providers should consider patient population distribution among the risk groups defined by Wells score for generalizing the study results to their setting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-05, ISPOR 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 2010)

Code

PSY25

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×