COMPARISON OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS IN EMPLOYEES WITH PAINFUL DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY TREATED WITH PREGABALIN OR DULOXETINE

Author(s)

Margolis J1, Cao Z2, Fowler R3, Harnett J4, Silverman SL51Thomson Reuters, Bala Cynwyd, PA, USA, 2Thomson Reuters, Cambridge , MA, USA, 3Thomson Reuters, Washington, DC, USA, 4Pfizer, New York, NY, USA, 5Cedars-Sinai/UCLA, Beverly Hills, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES:    To evaluate the effects on direct and indirect costs of initiating pregabalin or duloxetine in employees diagnosed with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN). METHODS:  Employees (18-64 years old) with a diagnosis of DPN and at least one claim for a pDPN-related pain medication were identified using the Thomson Reuters MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Research Database (2005-2008).  Patients were continuously enrolled in the 6-month pre- and 6-month post-initiation periods. To control for selection bias, propensity scored matched pregabalin and duloxetine new starts were evaluated. Key study outcomes including imputed medically-related work loss, prescription and healthcare utilization, and associated expenditures were analyzed using bivariate statistics and multivariate models in a difference-in-difference approach. RESULTS:   A total of 946 employees with pDPN (473 per group) were identified.  In the pre-index period, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in age (mean 54.0 ± 5.6 pregabalin and 53.3 ± 7.5 duloxetine), gender (females 52% pregabalin, 48% duloxetine), geographic distribution, insurance plan types, comorbidities, medication use, health care resource utilization or healthcare expenditures.  The average number of prescriptions in the 6-month post-index period was 2.9 ± 1.9 for pregabalin and 3.1 ± 2.1 for duloxetine.  There were no significant differences between treatment groups for pre-to-post changes in opioid utilization (marginal effect 1.3 percentage points fewer pregabalin opioid patients, p=0.328) as well as the number of pDPN-related pain medications (marginal effect 0.108 more medications for pregabalin, p=0.506).  The adjusted marginal effects for pre-to-post changes in all-cause health care expenditures ($154 greater increase for pregabalin patients, p=0.895), pDPN-attributable expenditures ($145 greater increase for pregabalin patients, p=0.359) and indirect costs ($458 relative decrease for pregabalin patients, p=0.324) were not statistically significant.   CONCLUSIONS:   There were no significant pre-to-post differences between pregabalin and duloxetine treatment groups in opioid use, DPN-related pain medication use, pDPN-attributable, all-cause and indirect expenditures.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-05, ISPOR 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 2010)

Code

PND5

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Neurological Disorders, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×