ASSESSING THE OUTCOME OF ELBOW SURGERY- DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RESPONSIVENESS OF THE PATIENT-REPORTED OXFORD ELBOW SCORE (OES)

Author(s)

Dawson J1, Fitzpatrick R1, Doll H1, Carr AJ2, Churchman D31University of Oxford, Health Services Research Unit, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, 2University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, 3Isis Innovation Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a patient-reported outcome measure for elbow surgery. METHODS: A questionnaire was created following semi-structured interviews with 18 patients being treated for elbow problems to determine candidate questions. These 18 questions were then prospectively tested, pre- and again at 6 months post-surgery, on 104 patients undergoing a variety of surgical treatments for elbow problems. Assessment of test/re-test reliability involved repeated OES completion, at home, 2 days later. Candidate questions were excluded if they showed high ceiling or floor effects, or if they cross-loaded to more than one domain. Underlying factor structure, dimensionality, internal and test retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the questionnaire items were assessed in relation to the: 1) Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) clinical scale; 2) Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; and 3) SF-36 general health survey. RESULTS: A total of 75% of patients were followed-up. Six candidate questions were excluded due to ceiling effect, cross loading or disordered response in Rasch analysis. A final 12-item questionnaire resulted, consisting of 3 unidimensional domains/scales: ‘Elbow Function’, ‘Pain’, ‘Social-Psychological’. Internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) for the 3 OES domains were optimal: Pain 0.89, Elbow function 0.90, Social-psychological 0.84. Test-retest reliability, (intra-class correlation coefficient), was good for all three domains (0.98; 0.90; 0,87). The OES showed high convergent correlation with the DASH and MEPS, with the exception of the social-psychological with the MEPS, which showed moderate correlation; correlation with related domains of the SF-36 was high. Divergent validity was confirmed by moderately low correlation with the general and mental health domains of the SF-36. Responsiveness was good, with effect sizes of >1.0 for the OES pain and social-psychological domains and for the MEPS; 0.80 for OES function and -0.74 for the DASH. CONCLUSIONS: The 12-question OES has good measurement properties in the context of elbow surgery.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-05, ISPOR 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 2010)

Code

PHP110

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×