ALISKIREN COMBINED WITH ANGIOTENSIN II-RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARB) RESULTED IN BETTER OUTCOMES COMPARED TO ARB COMBINED WITH ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS (ACEI)- RESULTS FROM A CLAIMS DATABASE ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Chang JR1, Yang W1, Kahler KH1, Fellers TS1, Orloff J1, Bensimon AG2, Yu AP2, Fan CPS2, Wu EQ21Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Medical, East Hanover, NJ, USA, 2Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To compare compliance/persistence, healthcare utilization, and costs associated with aliskiren+ARB vs. ARB+ACEI combination therapies among adult patients with hypertension. METHODS: Patients with hypertension (age≥18) initiated on combination therapy (≥15 days of overlap) with aliskiren+ARB or ARB+ACEI during July 2007-June 2008 were identified in the MarketScan Database. Study outcomes were measured during the 6-month study period, including medication possession ratio (MPR), treatment discontinuation rates, resource utilization, and changes in health care costs (from 6-month baseline to study period). Risk-adjusted differences in outcomes between aliskiren+ARB vs. ARB+ACEI patients and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariate regression models, controlling for demographics, comorbidities, prescription drug use, and healthcare resource utilization during the baseline period. RESULTS: Comorbidity profiles were similar between patients on aliskiren+ARB (N=1,395) vs. ARB+ACEI (N=16,507), though baseline resource utilization and costs were different between the cohorts. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, aliskiren+ARB patients demonstrated significantly higher MPR (difference=15.2% [95% CI: 13.0%, 17.4%]) and lower discontinuation rate (odds ratio=0.43 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.51]) than ARB+ACEI patients. Aliskiren+ARB patients had fewer all-cause hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.73 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.86]) and fewer all-cause emergency room (ER) visits (adjusted IRR=0.72 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.85]) than ARB+ACEI patients; results for cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and ER visits were similar. Compared to ARB+ACEI patients, aliskiren+ARB patients had larger increases in prescription costs by $264 during the 6 months following therapy initiation (95% CI: $153, $375), but showed a trend in reducing total healthcare costs by -$583 (95% CI: -$2,409, $1,242) during the same 6-month period.  CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hypertension initiated on aliskiren+ARB had significantly better compliance/persistence and lower frequencies of hospitalizations and ER visits than those initiated on ARB+ACEI. Trends indicated greater reductions in total healthcare costs with aliskiren+ARB, despite increased prescription costs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-05, ISPOR 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 2010)

Code

PCV53

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×