ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF RIVAROXABAN IN THE TREATMENT OF DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS IN GREECE

Author(s)

Kourlaba G1, Maniadakis N1, Giannoukas A2, Katsamouris A3, Katsenis K4, Lazarides M5, Matsagas M6, Lowin J7, McLeod EJ8, Bamber L91National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece, 2University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece, 3University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 4University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 5Democritus University, Thrace, Greece, 6University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, 7IMS Health, London , United Kingdom, 8IMS Health, London, United Kingdom, 9Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany

OBJECTIVES: To undertake an economic evaluation of rivaroxaban relative to standard care with injectable heparins (enoxaparin) followed by dose adjusted vitamin-K-antagonists for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: An international Markov model designed to reflect the management and complications of DVT in the course of three month cycles, up to death, was locally adapted. It comprises twelve health states and allows for the comparison of rivaroxaban against standard treatment in the six-month acute treatment phase. Baseline event rates and the relative treatment effect of rivaroxaban (HRs) were derived from the whole study population of the EINSTEIN DVT trial. Utility values were based on the published literature. Cost data reflect the year 2012 and were extracted from local sources. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated with quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) gained as the outcome measure. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic analysis was undertaken to deal with uncertainty. The analysis was undertaken from a payer perspective and all costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5%. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the average total cost of 6-month rivaroxaban-treated patients was €170 higher compared to patients treated with the standard care. Rivaroxaban was associated with additional drug costs (€457), however these were partially offset by reduced monitoring costs (€257). Moreover, rivaroxaban was associated with a small QALY increment (0.019) and the ICER was calculated at €8,795 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that the base case ICER was most sensitive to HRs for recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeds. Excluding the cost of rivaroxaban, the model was also relatively sensitive to mean cohort age. Probabilistic analysis revealed that the likelihood of rivaroxaban being cost-effective at a threshold of €30,000/QALY was 89% and at €40,000 was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban may represent a cost-effective new alternative for the management of DVT in Greece.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-11, ISPOR Europe 2012, Berlin, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 7 (November 2012)

Code

PCV54

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×