COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF BIOLOGIC THERAPIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE TO SEVERE PSORIASIS IN GERMANY

Author(s)

Betts K1, Yan Y2, Sundaram M3, Hengst N4, Wolff M4, Bensimon AG11Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 2Analysis Group, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 3Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA, 4Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany

OBJECTIVES: Etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab, and adalimumab have been granted marketing authorization for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Germany.  The objective of this study is to evaluate cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments from the German Social Health Insurance (SHI) perspective.  METHODS: A simple decision model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of biologics compared to supportive care for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis over a one-year time horizon.  Clinical efficacy was based on the relative probabilities of achieving PASI75, and PASI 90 response obtained via a network meta-analysis.  Weight-based dosing was assumed for infliximab and ustekinumab.  Costs were assessed in terms of 2012 euros, and included drug acquisition, administration, laboratory tests, clinic visits, and hospitalization costs. Cost-effectiveness from payer perspective was assessed as the cost-per-PASI75 response and cost-per-PASI90 response compared with supportive care (no systemic therapy) over a one-year time horizon.  One-way sensitivity analyses, where key parameters were changed to alternative plausible values, explored uncertainty in the results. RESULTS: In the base case, adalimumab was found to be the most cost-effective compared to supportive care (€25,378 per PASI75 responder and €46,870 per PASI90 responder), followed by infliximab (€30,719 per PASI75 responder and €47,300 per PASI90 responder), ustekinumab (€31,953 per PASI75 responder, and €57,852 per PASI90 responder), etanercept 50mg BIW (€43,049 per PASI75 responder and €101,306 per PASI90 responder), and etanercept 25 mg BIW (€43,156 per PASI75 responder and €111,369 per PASI90 responder).  The incremental cost per PASI 75 responder gained and the incremental cost per PASI 90 for infliximab compared to adalimumab were €51,812 and €48,112, and €87,942 and €106,911 respectively for ustekinumab. Adalimumab remained the most cost-effective over the vast majority of the one-way sensitivity analyses.  CONCLUSIONS: This study found that adalimumab is the most cost-effective biologic treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis from the German SHI perspective.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-11, ISPOR Europe 2012, Berlin, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 7 (November 2012)

Code

PSS14

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×