CHART AUDIT AND BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PASIREOTIDE VERSUS SECOND-LINE THERAPIES IN THE TREATMENT OF CUSHING'S DISEASE IN GERMANY

Author(s)

Badia X1, Forsythe A2, Stemmer V3, Cummins G41IMS Health, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA, 3Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany, 4Quintiles Consulting, Hawthorne, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: Pasireotide is a novel, injectable multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue that binds with high affinity to four of the five somatostatin receptors. It has been commercially available in Europe since May 2012 and is the first pituitary-targeted medical therapy indicated for adult patients with Cushing’s disease (CD) for whom surgery has failed or is not an option. This analysis aims to quantify the budget impact (BI) of utilizing pasireotide as second-line therapy in CD in Germany. METHODS: A thorough chart audit was conducted to analyze resource utilization and market shares of standard of care in CD. Epidemiology, treatment response complications and adverse event (AE) data were derived from published literature. Pasireotide data were taken from a Phase III clinical trial. German tariffs for each resource were then applied to an Excel-based model to compare utilization and costs with and without the introduction of pasireotide (net BI) for patients with CD over a 5-year horizon from the German healthcare system. RESULTS:  Applying a CD prevalence rate of 39 per million and the treatment success of first-line therapy, fewer than 200 patients with CD are eligible for pasireotide treatment in Germany. Assuming that pasireotide in years 1–5 will have a market share of 8%, 15%, 23%, 25% and 26%, the net BI is 812,769€, 549,676€, 1,553,976€, 2,088,511€ and 2,209,948€, respectively. Budget impact is reduced by early identification of pasireotide non-responders, low cost of treating pasireotide AEs, and potential displacement of second-line surgical treatments such as bilateral adrenalectomy. Pasireotide BI may be further minimized if offsets due to lower consumption of health care resources in controlled patients are considered.    CONCLUSIONS:  The introduction of pasireotide into the German healthcare system will result in clinical benefits for CD patients associated with a limited and predictable BI.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-11, ISPOR Europe 2012, Berlin, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 7 (November 2012)

Code

PDB21

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×