AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GRAZAX FOR THE TREATMENT OF GRASS POLLEN INDUCED RHINOCONJUNCTIVITIS IN CHILDREN

Author(s)

Sarah Whitehead, MSc, BSc, (Hons), Research Consultant1, Matthew J Taylor, BA, MSc, PhD, Senior Consultant1, Jens Christensen, MScEcon, Health Economist21University of York, York, United Kingdom; 2 ALK-Abelló, Hørsholm, Denmark

OBJECTIVES To determine the cost-effectiveness of the grass allergen immunotherapy tablet (AIT), Grazax (ALK-Abelló A/S) for the treatment of grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis in children either with or without co-existing asthma. The analysis compares treatment using Grazax in combination with symptomatic medications, to using symptomatic medications alone in terms of costs and health outcomes. METHODS The model uses a decision tree structure to evaluate two grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis treatments for a cohort of 1000 hypothetical children. The analysis is performed from the perspective of the payer, including only direct costs in the base case. Treatment is modelled in terms of the management of symptoms, reduction in resource use and averting the development of allergic asthma. The evaluation is UK-based and models both short- and long-term effects. Several data inputs, such as resource use and probabilities, are drawn from the paediatric GT-12 clinical trial and the Preventive Allergy Treatment (PAT) study. Cost data are sourced from established published sources and utility values are derived using GT-12 trial data and a published study. RESULTS Treatment with Grazax in combination with symptomatic medications compared to treatment with symptomatic medications alone generates a (discounted) incremental cost per QALY gained of 10,007GBP ($14,578, €11,034), for the base case time horizon of nine years. The QALY gains are a result of increased quality of life related to effective symptom management. The sensitivity analysis carried out around key parameters (e.g. unit costs, medication costs, probabilities, utilities) shows that the results estimated by the model remain robust. CONCLUSIONS Grazax has been shown to improve patient outcomes, at an increased cost. The resulting incremental cost per QALY falls below commonly accepted willingness to pay thresholds. Therefore, Grazax is a cost-effective option for the treatment of grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis in the UK paediatric population.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2009-05, ISPOR 2009, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 3 (May 2009)

Code

PRS26

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×