PHARMACOGENOMIC TESTING FOR WARFARIN USE IN TYPICAL OUTPATIENT SETTINGS LOWERS HEALTH CARE COSTS- THE MEDCO-MAYO WARFARIN EFFECTIVENESS STUDY
Author(s)
Aubert RE1, Epstein RS1, Yao J1, O'Kane DJ2, Tinnirello J1, Teagarden JR1, Moyer TP21Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA, 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
OBJECTIVES: To measure the comparative direct medical care costs between incident warfarin patients who did or did not experience genotyping to guide dosing. METHODS: We reanalyzed the previously published MM-WES in which we demonstrated that genotyping reduces the risk of hospitalization for bleeding and thromboembolism in patients who initiate warfarin treatment in typical outpatient practice settings. We used a cost consequence analysis to estimate the 6-month costs and consequences of warfarin genotyping. The intervention group (IG) comprised 896 patients and a comparison group was constructed from 2688 historical controls (HC). The direct medical care costs were estimated for inpatient, office visits and laboratory utilization (including cost of genotyping) and summed to a total cost per patient. A boot-strapping method was performed to estimate confidence limits around the difference in mean cost per patient to assess statistical significance. RESULTS: Over the 6-month monitoring period, the all cause–related per patient costs for the genotyped IG patient was $4127 compared to $5040 for HC. The all-cause difference of -$913 per patient reached statistical significance, 95% CI (-$895, -$930). Various subgroup analyses including warfarin-related costs will be presented. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that providing results of warfarin genotyping to treating physicians in typical outpatient settings produces cost-savings within six months of initiating warfarin therapy. These estimates are likely conservative as they do not include ancillary costs such as rehabilitation or indirect costs, nor do they estimate costs beyond six months.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)
Code
PCV68
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders, Respiratory-Related Disorders