IMPACT OF 5-HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST SELECTION WITHIN TRIPLE ANTIEMETIC REGIMENS ON THE RISK OF UNCONTROLLED CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NAUSEA IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER TREATED WITH HIGHLY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY
Author(s)
Schwartzberg L1, Jackson J2, Jain G2, Balu S31Accelerated Community Oncology Research Network, Memphis, TN, USA, 2Xcenda, LLC., Palm Harbor, FL, USA, 3Eisai, Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA
OBJECTIVES: Palonosetron, dolasetron, granisetron, and ondansetron [5-HT3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3-RAs)] are indicated to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Despite alternate CINV prophylaxis options, nausea still remains an undesirable side effect that is difficult to measure. This study evaluates the likelihood of uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea following antiemetic prophylaxis with palonosetron + aprepitant + dexamethasone (group 1) versus any of the other 5-HT3-RAs + aprepitant + dexamethasone (group 2) among single-day HEC cycles in cancer diagnosed patients. METHODS: Single-day HEC cycles (a gap of at least 5 days between 2 administrations) among patients with a cancer diagnosis and initiating antiemetic prophylaxis with group 1 versus group 2 between January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2010 were identified from the IMS LifeLink claims database. Uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea events were defined as ICD-9-CM codes for nausea, CPT codes for hydration, rescue medications, and/or use of antiemetic therapy from days 2-5 following HEC administration. Risk for an uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea event was analyzed at cycle level using a logistic multivariate regression model. RESULTS: A total of 8018 group 1 and 1926 group 2 cycles (3,574 and 978 patients, respectively) were analyzed. Groups 1 and 2 were similar in age [mean (sd): 52.8 (11.7) vs. 52.9 (11.6) years; p=0.861], Charlson comorbidity score [6.2 (3.1) vs. 6.2 (3.0); p=0.978], female (77.2% vs. 78.2%; p=0.4857), and cancer type distribution. Versus group 2, group 1 cycles had a significantly lower unadjusted risk of an uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea event (17.1% vs. 20.0%; p=0.0023), while the multivariate regression analysis predicted a 12% lower risk for group 1 cycles [Odds Ratio: 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77 – 0.995); p=0.0403]. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective claims data analysis, patients with cancer receiving single-day HEC cycles and palonosetron based triple drug prophylaxis for CINV had a lower risk for an uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea event versus older 5-HT3-RAs.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)
Code
PCN6
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Oncology