DOES STATIN INTERACTION MATTER IN CHRONIC WARFARIN USERS? AN ANALYSIS OF INR VALUE DISTRIBUTION AND ASSOCIATED HEALTH CARE COSTS

Author(s)

Yu CY1, Zhu Y1, LeNarz LA1, Bae JP1, Morgan RE2, Sponseller CA3, Zhao Z11Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2Kowa Research Institue, Morrisville, NC, USA, 3Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Montgomery, AL, USA

OBJECTIVES: A 10% increase in international normalized ratio (INR) was reported when a statin and warfarin were co-administered; the effect of such an increase for patients with INR values close to the upper therapeutic range can be clinically problematic and may accrue increased healthcare costs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a managed care claim database. The index INR test was defined as the first test occurring between 7/1/2008 to 6/30/2009. Stable chronic warfarin users were defined as having continuous warfarin use 60 days before and 6 months after the index INR test. The percentage of these patients with at least one INR value within 10% of the upper bound of therapeutic range (2 to 3) was identified. The number of office visits for INR  monitoring and associated costs were reported. RESULTS: Of the 3097 patients identified, 18527 INR values with a mean of 2.49 (SD=0.99) were identified. Among these patients, 35% had at least one INR value between 2.75 and 3.0. For those with all the INR values between 2 and 3 during the study period, the mean office visit for INR monitoring was 1.79 times (N=588, SD=1.49); the associated average charge was $78.26 per patient. This increased to 8.72 times (N=1523, SD=7.08) and $400.20 for those who had at least one INR greater than 3. Each office visit for INR monitoring requires a co-payment of $5 to $50. When the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation was added into the patient selection criteria, similar patterns of INR value distribution and associated costs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of chronic warfarin users had at least one INR value reported within 10% of the upper bound of the therapeutic range. A 10% increase of INR can result in abnormally high INR values, more office visits, and increased health care costs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)

Code

PCV66

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×