COST EFFECTIVENESS OF TICAGRELOR IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME IN GERMANY
Author(s)
Theidel U1, Asseburg C2, Giannitsis E3, Katus H31Herescon Gmbh, Hannover, Germany, 2ESiOR Ltd, Kuopio, Finland, 3Department of Medicine III, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
OBJECTIVES: The PLATO trial showed that in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treatment with ticagrelor plus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) compared with clopidogrel/ASA significantly reduced the rate of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or death from vascular causes without a significant increase in the rate of overall major bleedings. The present study evaluates the long-term cost-effectiveness of treating patients with ticagrelor in Germany from the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). METHODS: : A two-part decision-analytic model, comprising a decision tree approach for the first year followed by a long-term Markov model, was constructed to estimate lifetime costs and life year gained (LYG) of treating ACS patients for one year with ticagrelor/ASA compared with clopidogrel/ASA. Data for the first year were derived from the PLATO trial. For the long-term model the German lifetable from the cause-of-death-statistics and selected conservative assumptions were utilized to extrapolate survival conditional on whether a non-fatal MI, a non-fatal stroke or no event occurred during the first year. Costs were based on official tariffs (e.g. DRGs) and published literature. For the base case daily cost of €2.99 was applied for ticagrelor. Daily cost for clopidogrel was applied in a range from €0.38 (lowest generic) to €2.44 (Plavix) with an average generic cost of €0.68 (base case). Extensive probabilistic, uni- and multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: : Treatment with ticagrelor was associated with 0.16 LYG versus clopidogrel. The cost per LYG in the base case was €3,361. Overall the cost per LYG ranged from €-430 (dominant situation) to €4,077 compared with clopidogrel (Plavix vs. lowest generic). Results were consistent throughout the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Based on evidence from the PLATO study, treating a broad spectrum of ACS patients with ticagrelor for one year seems to offer a cost-effective option in the German health care setting compared with clopidogrel.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)
Code
PCV70
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders