COST-CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS COMPARING ROMIPLOSTIM TO RITUXIMAB IN THE TREATMENT OF ADULT PRIMARY IMMUNE THROMBOCYTOPENIA (ITP) IN FRANCE

Author(s)

Chiche L1, Lefrere F2, Chulikavit M3, Perrin A3, Stern L3, Bischof M4, Cohen S51Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France, 2Hopital Necker, Paris, France, 3Analytica International, New York, NY, USA, 4AMGEN (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland, 5Amgen S.A.S.

OBJECTIVES: Romiplostim stimulates platelet production via the thrombopoetin-receptor and is recommended for second- and third-line treatment of chronic ITP in adults. Traditional treatment options in this setting have included unapproved use of the immunosuppressant rituximab. This analysis assessed the cost per responder of romiplostim compared to rituximab in adult ITP patients in France. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed to estimate the six-month cost per patient responding to treatment.  A systematic literature review was performed to obtain response rates (achieving a platelet count ≥50x109/L) for each treatment. Romiplostim patients received weekly administrations; rituximab patients received 4 weekly intravenous infusions. Resource utilization was based on French and international treatment guidelines, and clinical expert opinion. Unit costs were derived from published literature and French reimbursement lists, and included the costs of routine physician visits, treatment administration and emergency care. Non-responders incurred the cost of rescue therapy (IVIg and prednisone) and hospitalizations/physician visits associated with bleeding-related events (BREs). RESULTS: Although the comparability of existing literature for romiplostim and rituximab was limited, several fulfilled the literature review selection criteria. Response rates were 83% and 62.5%, as per the romiplostim pivotal trial and a meta-analysis on rituximab, respectively. Mean cost per patient for romiplostim and rituximab was €17,486 and €17,086, respectively.  Dividing mean cost per patient by response rates, cost per response was €21,067 for romiplostim and €27,337 for rituximab. The main cost-offsets were due to reduced rescue therapy and BREs, with romiplostim resulting in a 23% reduction in cost per platelet response. Across sensitivity analyses, romiplostim consistently produced a lower cost per response.  CONCLUSIONS: In adult ITP patients, romiplostim yields a lower cost per response over 6 months compared to rituximab, indicating romiplostim represents an efficient use of resources for the French health care system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)

Code

PSY27

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×