BURDEN OF BRAIN METASTASIS IN AN METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) POPULATION

Author(s)

Ganguli A1, Henk H2, Teitelbaum A3, Ray S11Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA, 2OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 3i3 Innovus, Eden Prairie, MN, USA

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of brain metastasis (BrMets) on health care costs and survival among metastatic NSCLC patients in a geographically diverse commercially insured US population. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were conducted using a US commercial administrative claims database linking data from a lung cancer registry and mortality records from the Social Security Administration Death Master File (2005-2010). Two cohorts were formed – a) with BrMets, and b) without BrMets. Healthcare cost (hospitalization, ambulatory and pharmacy) and resource use (hospitalization, emergency {ER} and ambulatory visits) were compared using a generalized linear model (diagnosis →end of follow-up); a Cox proportional hazard model estimated impact on survival.  All models adjusted for stage at diagnosis, pre-diagnosis comorbidity, age, and gender. RESULTS: A total of 584 metastatic NSCLC patients were included (mean 60.5 years/56.3% male): 247 (42.3%) had claims-based evidence of BrMets and were more likely to have been diagnosed with stage IV disease (62.8% vs. 52.2% without BrMets). Overall survival was shorter among patients with evidence of BrMets (median = 13.5 vs. 17.0 months; HR=1.29, p<001); health plan enrollment duration was similar (median = 11.7 months). With similar lengths of follow-up, average health care costs following diagnosis of BrMets was 23% higher ($184,872 vs. $150,931; p=0.010) after adjustment for other factors.  The difference was consistent across resources: 25% higher hospitalization costs $46,871 vs. $37,504; p=.082); 23% higher ambulatory costs, ($121,224 vs. $98,276; p=0.033); 23% higher retail pharmacy costs, ($13,282 vs. $10,774; p=0.118).  Patients with BrMets averaged more hospitalizations (2.4 vs. 1.9; p=0.005), ER visits (2.7 vs. 2.2; p=0.067), and ambulatory encounters (111 vs. 92; p=0.005) from initial NSCLC diagnosis to end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Intensity of resource use and costs were higher in metastatic NSCLC, especially in BrMets patients. Treatment that improves disease control could reduce the intensity of cost and resource use among NSCLC BrMets patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)

Code

PCN39

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×