A COST–UTILITY ANALYSIS OF DEGARELIX IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED HORMONE-DEPENDENT PROSTATE CANCER IN SCOTLAND

Author(s)

Fisher D1, Brereton NJ1, Kildegaard Nielsen S2, Tate E31BresMed Health Solutions, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, 2Ferring International Center S.A., St. Prex, Switzerland, 3Hayward Medical Communications, Newmarket, Suffolk, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: Degarelix is the first gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist to be launched in the UK for first-line treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The aim of this evaluation was to predict long-term clinical and economic outcomes from treatment with degarelix compared to treatment with goserelin, standard current practice, from the perspective of NHS Scotland. METHODS: Analyses were conducted using a 20 year semi-Markov (cohort health-state transition) cost-utility model which was recently submitted to and accepted by the Scottish Medical Consortium (SMC). The model considers two patient groups – the intention-to-treat population (ITT) of patients with hormone-responsive prostate cancer in whom treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy is indicated and who would be prescribed a LHRH agonist and a high-risk population with a baseline PSA level >20ng/ml. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty in the model. RESULTS: The key benefit of treatment with degarelix comes from keeping patients in the first-line treatment state for longer, incurring less time and costs in the later more costly and lower utility non-hormonal therapy state. At NHS list-price degarelix is estimated to dominate treatment with goserelin within both populations with a saving of £271 and QALY gain of 0.46 in the ITT population. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses show that degarelix is likely to be cost-effective (at a willingness-to-pay of £500 per QALY) in 100% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The economic analysis shows that degarelix not only provides a better patient outcome but is also less costly than goserelin over a lifetime of treatment. It is rare for a new treatment to predict dominance over existing therapies – only 18% of SMC submissions up to 2011 have predicted dominance. In addition degarelix shows a large gain in quality of life (almost half a year in full health) even when a conservative assumption of no increase in survival is applied.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)

Code

PCN100

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×