A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CLOPIDOGREL IN PATIENTS WITH NON STABLE ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME IN GREECE

Author(s)

Kourlaba G, Fragoulakis V, Maniadakis NNational School of Public Health, Athens, Greece

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of one-year treatment with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared to aspirin alone in patients without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) from the Greek third-party-payer perspective. METHODS: A Markov model for evaluating the long-term cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in patients with NSTEMI was adapted and extended by using local utility and economic values. The effect of clopidogrel was applied during the first year in the model and was estimated by the CURE trial. Costs assigned to each health state included antiplatelet treatment cost, cost for the management of adverse events and the costs for concomitant medication, hospitalization, outpatient visits, rehabilitation and nursing. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted in order to assess the impact of all uncertain model parameters varying simultaneously. The results are presented as mean (95% Uncertainty Interval (UI)).  RESULTS: The analysis showed a discounted survival of 8.27 (8.25-8.30) years in the aspirin treatment group and 8.42 (8.39-8.44) years in the aspirin+clopidogrel treatment group; a difference of 0.14 (0.11-0.18, p<0.001) years. Adjusting the survival for the quality of life, the model predicts 7.52 (7.15–7.79) and 7.66 (7.27–7.94) discounted QALYs in the aspirin and clopidogrel+aspirin arm, respectively, resulting in a difference of 0.14 QALYs (0.10-0.17, p<0.001). The cumulative lifetime costs per patient were € 15,976 (€14,848–€17.156) and € 15,392 (€14,301- €16,535), for aspirin and clopidogrel+aspirin treatment arm, respectively, a difference of € 584 (€525-€647). The ICER was €4111 (€3342–€5169) for each life-year saved and €4385 (€3487–€5647) for each QALY saved. For a decision threshold of €5500 per discounted QALY, clopidogrel+aspirin is cost-effective in more than 95% of randomly sampled analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with clopidogrel in addition to aspirin is a cost-effective treatment option in patients with NSTEMI from the perspective of a third-party payer in Greece.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-11, ISPOR Europe 2011, Madrid, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 7 (November 2011)

Code

PCV76

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×