TOWARD HIGH PERFORMANCE 'PHARMACARE' SYSTEMS- A REVIEW OF EXPERIENCES IN SEVEN COUNTRIES

Author(s)

Steve Morgan, PhD, Assistant Professor1, Jae Kennedy, PhD, Associate Professor2, Libby Roughead, PhD, Associate Professor3, Katherine Boothe, MA, Doctoral Student1, Meghan McMahon, MA, Research Officer4, Diane Watson, PhD, Director of Research and Analysis51University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2 Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; 3 University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 4 Institute for Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; 5 Health Council of Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada

ObjectivesWhile pharmaceuticals can significantly improve the health of patients and help to mitigate health-related inequities within a population, their rising prominence within health systems is not without challenges. This paper explores health related aspects of pharmaceutical policy in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the UK and the US. MethodsDrawing on published goals for national policies, we developed a framework for gauging pharmacare system performance. We review policy structures and investigate system performance using preliminary indicators drawn from the 2007 Commonwealth Fund Survey. Survey responses to questions related to accessibility, affordability, and appropriateness are compared across countries and stratified by age, income and morbidity. Results Shares of populations reporting prescription drug use were lowest in Germany and highest in the US. Pharmaceutical use displayed expected age gradients in all countries and expected income gradients in all but Germany and the US. Cost-related non-adherence was most frequent in the US and Australia, and relatively unlikely among elderly populations. Relatively few patients reported prescribing errors, with no significant differences across countries. Out-of-pocket drug costs were highest in the US and Canada. From 1995 to 2005, pharmaceutical expenditures outpaced health care and GDP in all countries except New Zealand. Expenditure grew most quickly in the US. ConclusionThough no country appears uniformly strong in all areas of pharmacare policy, several appear to have done well to manage difficult tensions in the pharmaceutical sector.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-05, ISPOR 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 3 (May/June 2008)

Code

PHP25

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Health Disparities & Equity, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Pricing Policy & Schemes, Quality of Care Measurement, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×