THE RCT EVIDENCE OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF TOPICAL GLAUCOMA MEDICATION

Author(s)

Chia-Wen Lee, MSc, MA, PhD, Associate EBM Manager1, Felicity Buckley, BA, Senior Analyst2, Sophie Costello, MChem, MPhil, UK Manager2, Samuel DR Stoddart, MA, PhD, Senior Analyst2, Steven Kelly, MSc, Evidence Based Medicine Manager11Pfizer, Tadworth, Surrey, United Kingdom; 2 Heron Evidence Development Ltd, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

Objective: To classify published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of topical glaucoma treatment to identify where the evidence lies and the gaps for future research. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central and conference proceedings for RCTs recruiting adults with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and/or ocular hypertension (OH) receiving any topical medication or placebo. After double-data entry, the characteristics were analysed with a focus on prostaglandin-containing trials. Results: We identified 510 RCTs. Mean study duration was 15.2 weeks (SD 19.9), with 78% of studies lasting less than three months. Grouping of studies by duration and treatment showed that short-term efficacy was available for all treatments, but RCT evidence of longer-term safety (>12 months) was confined to latanoprost (three trials) and timolol maleate (two trials) in the monotherapy group and dorzolamide and timolol in fixed combination (one trial). The majority of the study population (79.6%) was Caucasian. The data on co-morbidity was sparse. Of prostaglandins, only latanoprost reported hypertension as a sub-group. Latanoprost monotherapy and latanoprost/timolol fixed combination therapy had been compared with the broadest range of alternative therapies. Latanoprost alone had been compared with all other classes of treatments. Conclusion: There are extensive RCT data available for glaucoma treatment. Latanoprost has the most RCTs and is the only prostaglandin analogue with RCTs over 12 months. Other research methodologies (i.e. observational studies) have to be considered alongside RCTs to address important clinical issues like long-term safety and disease progression. There is a lack of RCT evidence to explore differential treatment-effects among subgroups.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-05, ISPOR 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 3 (May/June 2008)

Code

PSS4

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×