IMPACT OF MEDICARE PART D DOUGHNUT HOLE ON THE USE OF MEDICATIONS BY THERAPEUTIC CLASSES FOR STANDARD BENEFICIARIES

Author(s)

Shawn X Sun, PhD, Manager Health Outcomes Collaborative Research, Kwan Y Lee, PhD, Director Health Outcomes Walgreens Health Services, Deerfield, IL, USA

Objective: The standard Medicare Part D benefit includes a “doughnut hole” in coverage. Standard benefit beneficiaries who fall into this gap are responsible for the total costs of their prescription drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of doughnut hole on the use of medications by therapeutic classes. Methods: A difference-in-difference (DID) study approach was used. De-identified data from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 were obtained from a pharmacy benefit management database. The study group included standard benefit beneficiaries who reached the doughnut hole in a time period from June 1 to October 31, 2006. The control group included beneficiaries enrolled in commercial prescription drug plans without coverage gaps. Changes in prescription days per month, out-of-pocket costs per month, and generic utilization rates by therapeutic classes were targeted outcome measures. Results: After controlling for demographics, disease conditions and secular trend of drug use, the Part D doughnut hole was found to be associated with reductions in use of antiasthmatics (-3.08 prescription days per month, p <0.0001), antineoplastics (-2.70, p <0.0001), antipsychotics (-1.77, p=0.0630), antidiabetic drugs (-1.63, p=0.0010), anticonvulsants (-1.49, p=0.0042), antidepressants (-1.11, p=0.0011), antihyperlipidemics (-1.09, p<0.0001), but slight increase in use of antivirals (0.08, p=0.9011) and opioid analgesics (0.05, p=0.8503). The Part D doughnut hole was also associated with significant increases in the average out-of-pocket costs for all therapeutic classes and increases in generic utilization rates for all classes except opioid analgesics. Conclusion: Standard Part D beneficiaries in the doughnut hole significantly reduced use of medications for potentially disabling and life-threatening conditions, but increased spending on medications for potentially less life-threatening conditions. This raises concern for an increased risk of adverse health events.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-05, ISPOR 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 3 (May/June 2008)

Code

MD3

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Pricing Policy & Schemes

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×