IMPACT OF FORMULARY RESTRICTIONS ON ADHERENCE TO SECOND GENERATION ANTIPSYCHOTICS

Author(s)

Feng Zeng, PhD, Health Economist1, R Scott Leslie, MPH, Health Outcomes Researcher1, Bimal V Patel, PharmD, MS, Director, Outcomes and Pharmacoeconomics1, Chi-Chang Chen, PhD, Manager, Global Epidemiology & Outcomes Research2, Edward Kim, MD, MBA, Associate Director, Outcomes Research USA, Global Epidemiology and Outcomes Research2, Russell Knoth, PhD, Global Epidemiology & Outcomes Research2, Quynh-Van Tran, PharmD, BCPP, Senior Manager, Medical Affairs OAPI31MedImpact Healthcare Systems, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA; 2 Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ, USA; 3 Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc, Rockville, MD, USA

Objective: To analyze the impact of formulary restrictions on adherence to second generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on data from a national pharmacy benefit management company covering January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005. Patients =18 years of age newly treated with SGAs (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone) were followed for up to 1 year after index prescription. The two cohorts were categorized as: open formulary (all SGAs on formulary without restriction), and/or restricted formulary (any SGA not on formulary, or any formulary SGA requiring step therapy or prior authorization). Logistic regression was used to determine the main effect of formulary category on medication adherence (medication possession ratio [MPR] =0.8) and the probability of changing index medication regimen (switching to or adding another drug, or discontinuing index drug), adjusting for co-pay, patient demographics, geographical location, concomitant medications, index drug and health plan type. Results: The study sample included 5017 patients (45% male) with a mean age of 46.2 years (SD 16.2). Patients in open formulary plans were significantly more likely to be adherent than patients in restricted formulary plans (OR=1.14, 95% CI: 1.05–1.23), and were significantly less likely to change their index regimen (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.84–0.99). Patients in single-tier formularies were significantly more likely to be adherent than those in two-tier formularies (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.15–1.27) and less likely to change their index regimen (OR=0.8, 95% CI: 0.75–0.85). Higher co-pays were associated with significantly lower adherence (OR=0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.98) but a lower likelihood of changing index regimen (OR=0.98, 95% CI:0.96–1.00). Conclusion: Patients newly started on SGAs are more adherent and less likely to change their initial medication regimens on open formulary plans than on restricted plans. Formulary restrictions may adversely impact treatment continuity in patients new to SGA therapy.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-05, ISPOR 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 3 (May/June 2008)

Code

DU5

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Formulary Development

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×