COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INSULIN DETEMIR COMPARED TO NPH INSULIN FOR TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS (T1DM) IN THE CANADIAN PAYER SETTING- MODELING ANALYSIS USING A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Author(s)

Michael E Minshall, MPH, Principal1, Sandra L Tunis, PhD, Senior Research Scientist1, Christopher Conner, PhD, Senior Manager2, John I McCormick, PhD, Associate3, Jovana Kapor, MD, Associate Medical Director, Diabetes4, Danielle Groleau, BA, Associate Director41IMS Health, Noblesville, IN, USA; 2 Novo Nordisk, Princeton, NJ, USA; 3 McKesson Phase 4 Solutions, Toronto, ON, Canada; 4 Novo Nordisk, Mississauga, ON, Canada

Objective: Insulin detemir represents a class of long-acting soluble insulin analogues intended to address basal insulin requirements for patients with diabetes. Because direct acquisition costs of newer medications are higher than older insulin treatments, payers are interested in their long-term value. This study was conducted to quantify the long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared to intermediate-acting NPH insulin for the treatment of T1DM in Canada. Methods: The CORE Diabetes Model was used to project lifetime clinical and economic outcomes for T1DM patients on insulin detemir versus NPH insulin. A slight advantage for insulin detemir in HbA1c (-0.12%) and significant reductions in major (69%) and minor (25%) hypoglycemic events were modeled. These clinical assumptions, as well as cohort characteristics (baseline age and HbA1c of 27 and 8.9%, respectively), transition probabilities, utilities, dis-utilities, direct treatment and complication costs (from a Canadian provincial payer perspective) were derived from recent published literature and on-line sources. Both clinical and economic outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum. Results: Average total direct costs per patient were CAN$88,403 for insulin detemir and CAN$76,551 for NPH using a lifetime horizon. A 61% reduction in major hypoglycemic events costs for detemir (CAN$765) vs. NPH (CAN$1965) were observed. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) increased by 0.344 years (discounted) with detemir and were largely due to decreased hypoglycemic events. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for detemir vs. NPH was CAN$34,418/QALY. Conclusion: The ICER obtained in this analysis provides evidence for the long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared to NPH in T1DM and is consistent with current Canadian standards. The overall value of detemir was driven primarily by its favorable impact upon hypoglycemic events as well as lower costs in treating major hypoglycemic events.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-05, ISPOR 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 3 (May/June 2008)

Code

PDB20

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×