THERAPEUTIC VERSUS ACTUAL MARKET SHARES FOR STATINS
Author(s)
Gorevski E, Bian B, Kelton C, Boone J, Guo JJUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
OBJECTIVES: This study estimated market shares for six statins based on 1) the literature-determined lipid-lowering potential of the drugs, and 2) the distribution of U.S. adults depending on the amount of lipid-lowering they required. Estimated market shares were compared with actual market shares. METHODS: Two panels (1999-2000 and 2001-2002) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) provided interview, demographic, and laboratory data for 3324 people > 20 years of age who were not taking a statin. In accordance with the ATP III Guidelines, coronary heart disease (CHD) and CHD-risk-equivalent events including diabetes, other risk factors such as smoking and high blood pressure, and Framingham scores to obtain 10-year risk estimates were identified and calculated, respectively for each person, along with percentage LDL-C lowering required to reach his or her LDL-C goal. Depending on the amount of lowering needed and on whether the individual had a liver condition, hence, enhanced risk of rhabdomyolysis, a particular statin or particular statins with equal probabilities were assigned to the individual; e.g., a person without a liver condition requiring 50% lowering of LDL-C would be assigned rosuvastatin or atorvastatin, each with probability = 0.5. RESULTS: Of 1643 men surveyed, 57.88% were in the lowest-risk group (0-1 risk factors); 14.36% were in the highest-risk group (CHD or CHD-risk-equivalent). For the 1681 women, these percentages were 73.11% and 11.30%, respectively. Of people needing a statin, 73.74% needed LDL-C lowering by < 25%; only 1.16% required LDL-C lowering of > 60%. Therapeutic market shares were estimated at 20.11% (rosuvastatin); 18.94% (atorvastatin); 17.89% (simvastatin); 16.96% (lovastatin); 13.05% (fluvastatin); and 13.05% (pravastatin). CONCLUSIONS: Actual market shares are significantly different from market shares based on lipid-lowering considerations. Explanations include direct-to-consumer advertising; varying pricing strategies; and clinical trials for additional indications and subpopulations conducted only by the market leaders.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)
Code
PCV134
Topic
Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Post Marketing Studies
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders, Respiratory-Related Disorders