RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS CONDUCTED BY UK'S NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (NICE) IN SEVERAL CANCER INDICATIONS- HIGHER EVIDENCE BARRIERS FOR TARGETED THERAPIES?

Author(s)

Banerji L, Das SJ&D Associates, London, London, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: We undertook a retrospective analysis of NICE technology appraisals in NSCLC, haematological malignancies; gastric and breast cancer and compared submission evidence with final NICE recommendation. METHODS: The analysis was based on a review of published appraisals on the NICE website from 2007-2010. RESULTS: Over the past 3 years, NICE completed 15 appraisals in the indications of NSCLC, haematological malignancies, gastric and breast cancer. Ten of these appraisals were of targeted-therapies.  A total of 5 out of 15 appraisals were not recommended mainly because weak clinical evidence surrounding efficacy.  One of these technologies, Lapatinib, was not recommended for breast cancer despite the manufacturer offering a patient-access scheme. Focusing on the 10 appraisals that received positive recommendation, 4 appraisals received unconditional reimbursement. Rituximab is the only targeted-therapy to receive unconditional reimbursement because it was cost effective (

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

NI1

Topic

Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×