RENAL MORBIDITY, MORTALITY, AND COSTS IN INDIVIDUALS UNDERGOING INVASIVE CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION PROCEDURES WITH LOW-OSMOLAR CONTRAST MEDIA- A LARGE RETROSPECTIVE DATABASE ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Min J1, Ryan A2, Spalding J31Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA, 2GE Healthcare Clinical Data Services, Princeton, NJ, USA, 3GE Healthcare, Barrington, IL, USA

OBJECTIVES: To investigate in-hospital hemodialysis (HD), length of stay (LOS), mortality, and costs following use of low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) in patients undergoing invasive cardiac catheterization procedures. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used the Premier Perspective™ database, which contains patient-level data. In-patient adults without prior HD who underwent invasive cardiac catheterization procedures with LOCM during 2007-2008 were studied (iohexol: n=36,118, iopamidol: n=36,089, ioversol: n=135,619). Propensity score weighted and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: In-hospital HD rates were low after exposure to any of the 3 LOCM (0.9% iohexol, 1.0% iopamidol, 1.0% ioversol). Risk of HD did not differ between iopamidol and iohexol, but ioversol demonstrated increased risk of HD compared to iohexol (adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.35) and iopamidol (adjusted OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.34). For in-hospital mortality (2.1% iohexol, 2.3% iopamidol, 1.9% ioversol), no between-group differences were statistically significant. Similarly, all-cause 30-day readmission rates (10.8% iohexol, 10.4% iopamidol, 10.6% ioversol) did not differ significantly between the groups. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury-related 30-day readmission rates were 0.2% in all 3 groups. There was no significant difference in the mean adjusted LOS between the groups (6.2-6.3 days). Iohexol was associated with a significantly lower (P<0.001) mean adjusted initial hospitalization cost ($21,591) compared with either iopamidol ($23,482) or ioversol ($23,484) and with a significantly lower (P<0.001) mean adjusted initial hospitalization cost post-procedure ($10,512) compared with either iopamidol ($11,393) or ioversol ($11,187). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of hospitalized patients, in-hospital HD rates were low after invasive cardiac catheterization procedures with LOCM. The risk of HD was comparable with iohexol and iopamidol, while ioversol was associated with a significantly higher risk. While in-hospital mortality rates, LOS, and all-cause 30-day readmission rates did not differ significantly between the 3 LOCM, iohexol was associated with significantly lower cost.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PCV56

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×