MANAGEMENT OF ACROMEGALY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE CONDITIONS IN SPAIN

Author(s)

Roset M1, Merino-Montero S1, Luque M2, López-Mondéjar P3, Salinas I4, Soto A5, Bernal C6, Villabona C7, De Luis D8, Donnay S9, Pascual H10, Pérez-Luis J111IMS Health, Barcelona, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario La Princesa Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Madrid, Spain, 3Servicio de Medicina Interna-Endocrino. Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain, 4Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain, 5Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain, 6Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, 7Servicio de Endocrinología Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain, 8Sección de Endocrinología y Nutrición Clínica, Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Valladolid, Spain, 9Unidad de Endocrinología y Nutrición de la Fundación Hospital de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain, 10Sección de Endocrinología y Nutrición Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain, 11Servicio de Endocrinología Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain

OBJECTIVES: The goal of treating acromegaly is directed at removing the tumor, preventing tumor re-growth and reducing long-term morbidity and mortality. For this purpose, different health resources are necessary. This study evaluates the disease resources and costs in Spain. METHODS: An epidemiological, prospective, naturalistic, multicentric study (30 endocrinologists) involving acromegalic patients with micro (≤10mm) or macro (>10mm) adenomas was performed. Patients were categorised as Surgical Group (SG) (surgery in the 6 months before inclusion or during follow-up period and somatostatin analogue (SA) treatment for <6 months during the pre-surgery period) and Medical Treatment Group (MTG) (patients receiving SA treatment for ≥6 months, with/without surgery following SA treatment). Resource data were collected from standard visits during a 2-years period. RESULTS: The study included 74 patients (56 SG and 18 MTG). Most patients were women (62%). The mean (SD) age was 49 (14) years. The annual direct acromegaly cost per patient is €9,668 (€9,223 SG vs. €11,054 MTG). The cost of illness was higher in patients with macroadenoma than in microadenoma (€11,053 vs. €5,809), and it is increased in young patients (<40 years). Surgical procedures in acromegaly (involving hospitalization and complementary tests) constitute the 22% and 8% of the illness cost in SG and MTG patients. Additionally, hospitalizations in intensive care units (50% SG vs. 22% MTG patients), emergency visits (21% SG vs. 6% MTG) and the presence of adenoma complications (73% SG vs. 44% MTG) constitute a source of cost increment in these patients. Patients who accomplish with the most strict study clinical control criteria (GH<1.0 and IGF-1<100%) showed the lowest direct cost of illness (€6,169 vs €12,990). CONCLUSIONS: The economic cost of acromegaly is dependent on the clinical control of the disease. Direct cost of illness is the half that the cost in non controlled patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PDB84

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Hospital and Clinical Practices

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×