HEALTH RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF SUBJECTS RECEIVING DENOSUMAB AND ZOLEDRONIC ACID IN A RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 TRIAL OF ADVANCED BREAST CANCER PATIENTS WITH BONE METASTASES

Author(s)

Body JJ1, von Moos R2, Stopeck A3, Qian Y4, Braun A4, Chung K41Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Brussels, Belgium, 2Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland, 3University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA, 4Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Bone metastases occur in up to 75% of patients with advanced breast cancer.  Skeletal complications of bone metastases include pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, and surgery and radiation to bone.  In a recently completed trial of breast cancer patients with bone metastases, denosumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-RANKL antibody, was superior to zoledronic acid (ZA) in delaying/preventing skeletal related events (SRE). METHODS: Eligible patients (N=1026, denosumab; N=1020, ZA) received monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg or intravenous ZA 4 mg in a double-bind, double-dummy design. Health resource utilization (HRU) data, excluding protocol-specified visits, were collected from all randomized patients monthly through end of study (median duration 17 months, both groups). RESULTS: Comparing patients who experienced any on-study SRE (n=315, denosumab; n= 372, ZA) with patients without an on-study SRE, a greater proportion reported at least one radiation oncology unit visit (22.9% vs 8.7%), clinic visit (75.5% vs 71.1%), and inpatient hospitalization (62.9% vs 48.6%).  The mean number of clinic visits and inpatient hospitalizations was also greater for patients who experienced an on-study SRE.  A between-treatment group comparison of denosumab vs ZA demonstrated that for patients with one or more clinic visits who experienced any on-study SRE, the denosumab group had 10% fewer mean clinic visits compared with the ZA group (15.5 vs 17.2 visits).  Additionally, mean radiation oncology clinic visits were decreased by 32% in the denosumab compared with the ZA group (4.2 vs 6.2 visits) and mean inpatient hospitalizations were decreased by 12% (3.7 vs 4.2 hospitalizations). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of treatment group, patients who had an on-study SRE had greater HRU compared with patients not experiencing an on-study SRE.  In this study, among those with any on-study SRE, patients treated with denosumab had fewer clinic visits, radiation oncology unit visits, and inpatient hospitalizations compared to patients treated with zoledronic acid.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PCN146

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×