COST EFFECTIVENESS OF ERLOTINIB IN FIRST LINE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) IN FIT ELDERLY PATIENTS- AN ECONOMICAL ANALYSIS OF A PROSPECTIVE PHASE 2 STUDY (GFPC 0504)

Author(s)

Chouaid C1, Le caer H2, Crequit J3, Monnet I4, Chouabe S5, Locher C6, Paillotin D7, Auliac JB8, Thomas P9, Vergnenegre A101Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France, 2Hôpital de draguignan, Draguignan, France, 3Centre Hospitalier de Beauvais, Beauvais, France, 4Centre Intercommunal de Creteil, Creteil, France, 5Centre hospitalier de Charleville Meziere, Charleville Mézières, France, 6Hôpital Saint Faron, Meaux, France, 7CHU de Rouen, Rouen , France, 8Service De Pneumologie, mantes la jolie , France, 9Centre Hospitalier, GAP, France, 10SIME, Limoges, France

€OBJECTIVES: Median age of newly diagnosed non small cell lung cance (NSCLC) is 70 years (with 1/3 older than 75 years) and elderly are more vulnerable to chemotherapy. In this population, weekly gemcitabine and docetaxel or erlotinib are both active in advanced NSCLC treatment. The GFPC0504 randomized prospective phase 2 study assess in fit elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, efficacy of weekly chemotherapy followed by erlotinib if progression (Arm A) versus erlotinib followed by chemotherapy if progression (arm B). The main objective of this study was time before second progression, secondary objective was overall survival. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib in 1st line treatment of NSCLC in fit elderly patients. METHODS: Outcomes (PFS and overall survival) and direct medical costs until second progression (from the third party payer perspective) were prospectively collected. Costs after second progression and health utilities (based on disease states and grade 3-4 toxicities) were derived from the literature. RESULTS: For respectively 48 and 51 patients randomised respectively in arm A and B PFS were 6.4 and 5.2 months, overall survival were 9.2 and 7.9 months; mean Qualy and mean direct costs (euros value 2010)  were respectively  €0.434 ± €0.394 and €26,297 ± €25,297 and €0.471± €0.451 and €25,948 ± €18,206, Acceptability curve will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of fit ederly patients, erlotinb in first line, followed by chemotherapy if progression appears as dominant compare to chemotherapy followed by erlotinib if progression. 

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PCN84

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×