COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF TREATMENT OF CHRONIC HEPATITIS C PATIENTS WITH PEGINTERFERON ALFA-2A OR PEGINTERFERON ALFA-2B BOTH PLUS RIBAVIRIN IN SPAIN
Author(s)
Ventayol-Bosch P1, Rubio-Terrés C2, García-Samaniego J3, Planas R4, Solà-Lamoglia R5, Romero-Gómez M6, Diago-Madrid M7, Crespo-García J8, Calleja-Panero JL9, Turnes-Vázquez J101Hospital Universitario Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2HealthValue, Madrid, Spain, 3Hospital Carlos III, CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain, 4Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, CIBEREHD, Barcelona, Spain, 5Hospital del Mar (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain, 6Hospital Universitario de Valme, CIBEREHD, Sevilla, Spain, 7Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 8Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain, 9Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain, 10Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
OBJECTIVES: To estimate long-term cost-effectiveness of treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with peginterferon alfa-2a (180 mcg/week) versus peginterferon alfa-2b (1.5 mcg/kg/week) both in combination with ribavirin (800-1400 mg/day) from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective. METHODS: A meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized trials of peginterferon alfa-2a and peginterferon alfa-2b both plus ribavirin, evaluating sustained virological response (SVR) has been recently published. It showed RR= 1.11 (95%CI 1.04-1.19) for all genotypes, RR= 1.21 (95%CI 1.03-1.42) for G-1/4, and RR= 1.11 (95%CI 1.02-1.22) for G-2/3. A Markov model with 7 health states was developed to simulate the disease progression of adult patients with CHC for a lifetime horizon. Efficacy, in terms of SVR, was calculated from the meta-analysis, showing a better SVR rate for peginterferon alfa-2a than for peginterferon alfa-2b: the absolute differences were of 6.0%; 7.6%; and 8.7% for all genotypes, G-1/4 and G-2/3 respectively. Transition probabilities and health states utilities were obtained from published literature. Health direct costs of peginterferon + ribavirin (48 weeks for G-1/4 and 24 weeks for G-2/3) and of disease complications were collected from Spanish databases and studies ([€] 2010). The annual discount rate was 3.5% for costs and outcomes. RESULTS: Each patient gained 0.469, 0.600 and 0.685 life years (LY) and 0.155, 0.198 and 0.227 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) with peginterferon alfa-2a in comparison with peginterferon alfa-2b, for all genotypes, G-1/4 and G-2/3 respectively. The savings per patient treated with peginterferon alfa-2a were €705, €672 and €1900, for all genotypes, G-1/4 and G-2/3, respectively. Peginterferon alfa-2a was the dominant treatment strategy (lower costs and higher efficacy than peginterferon alfa-2b treatment). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a + ribavirin is a cost-effective strategy in comparison with peginterferon alfa-2b + ribavirin for all genotypes, G-1/4 and G-2/3.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)
Code
PIN45
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Respiratory-Related Disorders
Explore Related HEOR by Topic