COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF PREGABALIN ADDED TO USUAL CARE VERSUS USUAL CARE IN REFRACTORY PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHIC PAIN PATIENTS IN SWEDEN
Author(s)
Sandelin R1, Prettyjohns M2, Lister SP21Pfizer, Sollentuna, Sweden, Sweden, 2Cardiff Research Consortium Ltd, Cardiff, United Kingdom
OBJECTIVES: Patients refractory to older therapies for neuropathic pain (NeP) have few remaining therapeutic options. To demonstrate pregabalin's value to decision-makers, this study evaluates the cost-utility of pregabalin in the treatment of patients with refractory neuropathic pain in Sweden, from a healthcare and societal perspective. METHODS: A discrete event simulation (DES) model was constructed to compare pregabalin with usual care. Pain profiles were generated for the pregabalin and usual care cohorts using clinical data from a synthesis of five non-randomised pregabalin studies in treatment-refractory patients. Utility data were generated from a UK survey of patients with NeP, which were used in a recent successful Health Technology Assessment (HTA) of pregabalin in the UK [1]. Cost data were generated from the Swedish TLV’s product price database, a national NeP register, and a regional register study. Indirect costs were estimated from published sources. One-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA), evaluated uncertainty in the model’s output. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for pregabalin compared to usual care was 51,616 SEK/€5,364 (123,993 SEK/€12,886 excluding indirect costs). One-way sensitivity analyses confirmed the clinical input data as the main driver of the model; even considerable changes to all other input parameters had only a modest effect on the ICER. The PSA generated an ICER of 41,634 SEK/€4,327 (with indirect costs included), suggesting that the model is relatively insensitive to the combined variation in all input parameters; this is evident in the ICER scatter, in which the cost-effectiveness pairs are tightly grouped. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found pregabalin to be highly cost-effective compared to usual care in Swedish treatment-refractory patients. Moreover, the PSA showed pregabalin’s favourable cost-effectiveness to be robust in all modelled scenarios, with an ICER well below a conservative threshold of 347,495 SEK /€36,113/£30,000. [1] Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC). Pregabalin re-submission, advice issued May 2009.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)
Code
PSY45
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Systemic Disorders/Conditions