COST COMPARISON STUDY IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES AND ACUTE HEART FAILURE PATIENTS
Author(s)
Ondrackova B1, Parenica J2, Felsoci M2, Miklik R2, Horakova K2, Spinar J2, Sulcova A11Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic, 2Faculty Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare direct in-hospital costs in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes (ACS; unstable angina or myocardial infarction), acute heart failure (AHF) and acute coronary syndromes complicated by heart failure (ACS with AHF) from health care payer perspective. METHODS: Patients hospitalized from 2005 to 2008 were classified in registry of Faculty Hospital Brno according to the clinical characteristics. Direct in-hospital costs (flat rate of admission and stay; medication and procedures) were evaluated in total 965 ACS (73% male; 64.7 years; 54% STEMI), 962 AHF (56% male; 70.8 years) and 808 AHF with ACS (62% male; 71.2 years; 61% STEMI) patients. The severity of disease was qualified as need of intensive care (ICU days); the predictors of high cost were identified in all groups. (1€=26CZK) RESULTS: Mean in-hospital cost was 101658CZK/3910€ in ACS pts (length-of-stay 5.6 days; 81% pts 2.3 ICU days; 0.3% died), 70201CZK/2700€ in AHF pts (length-of-stay 9 days; 48 % pts 4 ICU days; 11.4 % died) and 122340CZK/4705€ in ACS with AHF (length-of-stay 7.2 days; 92% pts 3.5 ICU days; 19.2% died). Percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting (PCI) formed more than 80% of total cost in ACS patients (performed in 78% pts.; 91% STEMI; 62% non-STEMI) and almost 60% costs in ACS with AHF pts (performed in 66% pts; 84% STEMI; 39% non-STEMI); antiarrhythmic interventions (incl. ICD, CRT BiV or PM device) made almost 50% cost in AHF although carried out in 8.6% pts. CONCLUSIONS: According to in-hospital costs patients with acute coronary syndromes complicated by heart failure were the most costly with maximum need of intensive care. Since 26.7% pts were transferred to other health care institution (e.g. 9% cardiosurgery) we expect the most significant increase of total amount of direct in-hospital costs in comparison with ACS (16.9% pts transferred) or AHF (11.5% pts transferred).
Conference/Value in Health Info
2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)
Code
PCV41
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders