A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON DISEASE BURDEN AND UNMET NEEDS FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN HOSPITALISED MEDICAL PATIENTS IN EUROPE SHOWS UNDER-UTILISATION OF PREVENTIVE THERAPIES

Author(s)

Khoury H1, Welner S1, Kubin M2, Folkerts K2, Haas S31BioMedCom Consultants inc., Dorval, QC, Canada, 2Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany, 3Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and current practice patterns for VTE prophylaxis in hospitalised acutely ill medical patients in Europe. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in major databases on the epidemiology and treatment practices of VTE prevention among adult patients treated in hospital for major medical conditions. Relevant studies published between 1999 and April 2010 were captured. RESULTS: Thirty-five multinational and country-specific studies were retrieved, including randomized clinical trials, registry and chart audits, meta-analyses, and cross-sectional, retrospective, prospective, and observational studies. Among patients admitted for an acute medical illness, the incidence of VTE diagnosed during hospitalisation ranged from 3.01% (mean hospital stay: 4.5 days) to 15% (day 14 from index hospitalisation). While clinical guidelines recommend pharmacological VTE prophylaxis to all patients hospitalised for an acute medical illness who are bedridden, a clear identification of specific risk groups who would benefit from VTE prevention is lacking. In the majority of studies captured, prophylaxis was underused among medical inpatients (all diseases); 33% to 82% of all patients hospitalised for acute medical illnesses did not receive any VTE prophylaxis. Furthermore, among patients who did receive prophylaxis, a considerable proportion received medication that was not in agreement with guidelines, due to short duration, suboptimal dose, or inappropriate type of prophylaxis. Of all prescriptions, low molecular weight heparin was the most widely prescribed anticoagulant. In most cases, the duration of VTE prophylaxis did not exceed hospital stay duration, and varied between 5 and 33.8 days (mean duration). CONCLUSIONS: VTE imposes a substantial burden among hospitalised medical patients. Despite the proven efficacy of prophylaxis, utilisation remains suboptimal among medical patients at risk for VTE, stressing the necessity for improved or easier access to proven preventive therapies among these patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-11, ISPOR Europe 2010, Prague, Czech Republic

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PCV137

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×