TIME AND SUPPLIES FOR WOUND MANAGEMENT DURING AND AFTER BREAST REDUCTION SURGERY IN GERMANY AND THE NETHERLANDS- PRINEO* VS STANDARD OF CARE
Author(s)
De Cock E1, Van Nooten F2, Raluy M1, Müller K3, Fabré J4, Hargreaves J51United BioSource Corporation, Barcelona, Spain, 2United BioSource Corporation, London, United Kingdom, 3ASKLEPIOS Klinik Wandsbek, Hamburg, Germany, 4UMC St. Radboud, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 5Ethicon a Johnson & Johnson Company, Livingston, United Kingdom
OBJECTIVES: PRINEO* Skin Closure System (PRINEO*) offers effective and safe wound closure compared to Standard of Care (SOC). This study evaluated health resource utilization attributable to PRINEO* vs. SOC for breast reduction in Germany and the Netherlands. METHODS: A time and motion study was conducted in one centre per country. Trained centre staff collected 10 observations in patients who underwent breast reduction (5 PRINEO* and 5 SOC). Data were collected for surgery through post-op care. Data Observation Forms were designed based on information obtained from staff interviews. Activities were observed for which differences in time and supplies between PRINEO* and SOC were expected: incision closure, dressing application, and dressing changes. RESULTS: In Germany, average time for skin layer closure was 3.47min with PRINEO* vs. 16.67min for SOC. Average wound length was 57cm vs. 54cm, respectively, translating into higher speed of closure with PRINEO* (16.50cm/min) compared to SOC (3.22cm/min). Overall time for wound closure was similar in both arms due to increased time for dermal layer closure with PRINEO* (42min). In the Netherlands, average time for skin layer closure was 1.57min for PRINEO* vs. 15.83min for SOC. Average wound length was 48cm vs. 49cm, respectively, translating into a speed of closure with PRINEO* of 30.74cm/min compared to 3.11cm/min with SOC. Time for dermal and skin layer closure combined was lower for PRINEO* (13.47min vs. 29.93min). For dressing application and post-op dressing changes, SOC required on average 18.28min in Germany and 3.95min in the Netherlands. Additionally, the use of 1.2 PRINEO* units on average resulted in the elimination of sutures and dressings in both centres. CONCLUSIONS: In one German and Dutch centre, the use of PRINEO* lead to increased skin closure speed and avoided time and supplies associated with dressing application and changes, at the expense of an average 1.2 PRINEO* units.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2009-10, ISPOR Europe 2009, Paris, France
Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 7 (October 2009)
Code
PIH25
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Pediatrics, Reproductive and Sexual Health