ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA (MSTS) IN THE FINNISH SETTING
Author(s)
Soini EJ1, García San Andrés B2, Joensuu T31ESiOR Oy, Kuopio, Finland, 2PharmaMar, Madrid, Spain, 3International Comprehensive Cancer Centre Docrates, Helsinki, Finland
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a new orphan drug trabectedin, Yondelis, against various end-stage treatments (EST) following the failure with two chemotherapy agents (anthracycline and ifosfamide) that are approved for the first line treatment of mSTS in Finland. METHODS: An Excel-based Markov model with trabectedin and no trabectedin arms is used in the evaluation. Analyses are performed from a societal lifetime perspective (production losses and VAT excluded) using a probabilistic (second-order Monte Carlo) approach. The cost-effectiveness is evaluated on the basis of cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier, incremental cost per life-year gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained. Included resources are drugs, mSTS treatments, adverse event treatments and travelling. In the base case analysis, 33% of patients are assumed to receive EST (67% etoposide, 33% dacarbazine). The effectiveness of drugs is based on the indirect comparison of EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (Nielsen 2000; van Oosterom 2002) and ET743-STS-201 trial results. Finnish resources and costs from year 2006 are taken, and both costs and outcomes are discounted with 5% per annum. RESULTS: Trabectedin is associated with incremental 1.14 LYGs, €37,875 additional costs and €33,099 cost per LYG compared to EST. With the willingness to pay of €50,000 per LYG, trabectedin has over 98% probability of being cost-effective. When the quality of remaining life time is taken into account using assumptions, the incremental cost per QALY range between €38,801-€46,425. The results are robust according to multiple sensitivity analyses (including also comparisons against other ESTs: etoposide or dacarbazine monotherapy; doxorubicin, ifosfamide, mesna and dacarbazine (IADIC); ifosfamide, mesna, etoposide, fenobarbital and growth hormone (IE); and ifosfamide, mesna, etoposide and methotrexate (IMVP-a6)). CONCLUSIONS: Trabectedin is a valuable addition for the treatment of mSTS. The cost-effectiveness of trabectedin is comparable or even superior to many other cancer drugs for non-orphan conditions.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2009-10, ISPOR Europe 2009, Paris, France
Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 7 (October 2009)
Code
PCN105
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology