COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF LEFLUNOMIDE (ARAVA) IN THE TREATMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) IN POLAND

Author(s)

Plisko R1, Krzystek J1, Lis J2, Rys P11HTA Consulting, Krakow, Poland, 2Sanofi-Aventis, Warsaw, Poland

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of leflunomide used before tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors compared with leflunomide after TNF inhibitors in the sequence treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following the failure of 2 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in Polish setting. METHODS: A cost-utility approach was adopted, evaluating total direct costs incurred by the National Health Fund (NHF) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). A micro-simulation Markov model was used to estimate utilities and costs. Simulation was executed in 6 months cycles and terminated at the time of the patient’s death. Transition probabilities between health states were calculated based on a systematic review of RCTs and supplemented with published literature if necessary. Health states utilities were taken from published literature. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. The starting time-point of the model was the failure of two previous DMARDs. Six treatment options were compared. Upon treatment failure it was assumed patients would follow an identical lifetime treatment strategy consisting of: LIM – leflunomide, infliximab, methotrexat, LEM - leflunomide, etanercept, methotrexat, LAM - leflunomide, adalimumab, methotrexat, ILM – infliximab, leflunomide, methotrexat, ELM – etanercept, leflunomide, methotrexat, ALM – adalimumab, leflunomide, methotrexat. RESULTS: Sequences with leflunomide at the beginning of the RA treatment (LIM, LAM, LEM) were dominant over schedules with leflunomide used after TNF inhibitors (ILM, ELM, ALM). Detailed results: LIM vs. ILM (cost difference – 7,788 PLN, QALY difference – 0.002); LEM vs. ELM (cost difference – 18,871 PLN, QALY difference – 0.004); LAM vs. ALM (cost difference – 11,377 PLN, QALY difference – 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The model predicted that leflunomide should be used before TNF inhibitors. LEM, LAM, LIM sequences for RA patients who have failed DMARDs therapy are less costly and more effective than sequences with leflunomid administrated after TNF inhibitors (ILM, ELM, ALM).

Conference/Value in Health Info

2009-10, ISPOR Europe 2009, Paris, France

Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 7 (October 2009)

Code

PMS49

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×