COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ENOXAPARIN FOR EXTENDED THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM (VTE) AFTER ELECTIVE TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT (THR) SURGERY

Author(s)

Weitz J1, Bernard L2, Wakeford C31McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2Cornerstone Research Group, Burlington, ON, Canada, 3Sanofi-Aventis, Laval, QC, Canada

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) comparing 35 days of  prophylaxis (extended enoxaparin) with short term prophylaxis (12 days  enoxaparin) for thromboprophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement (THR) surgery at high risk for VTE.  The analysis was for a lifetime horizon from a Canadian payer perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate incremental cost per life year gained and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.  Clinical outcomes considered in the model included symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and major bleeding associated with thromboprophylaxis.  Treatment-specific event rates for DVT, PE and major bleeding were derived as pooled estimates from 3 pivotal clinical trials of extended enoxaparin versus short-term enoxaparin.  Ontario resource utilization and unit costs derived from published literature were applied to trial-based drug treatment and events to estimate the costs of drug acquisition and administration, and diagnosing and managing DVT, PE, PTS and major bleeding.  Utility weights used in the calculation of QALYs were also derived from the literature.  RESULTS: Compared with short-term enoxaparin extended enoxaparin resulted in 39.6 fewer VTE events per 1,000 patients and a gain of approximately 0.01 life years and QALYs per patient.  Total costs were higher for extended enoxaparin, resulting in an incremental cost of CAD$22,675 per life year gained and $26,254 per QALY gained (discounted at 5% per year).  The results were most sensitive to assumptions regarding the percentage of patients requiring home nursing to administer enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective THR surgery, extended thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin reduces the risk of VTE and provides favourable cost-effectiveness ratios compared with short-term thromboprophylaxis only with enoxaparin.  The analysis demonstrates that extended thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin in patients undergoing THR surgery represents a cost-effective use of resources.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2009-10, ISPOR Europe 2009, Paris, France

Value in Health, Vol. 12, No. 7 (October 2009)

Code

PCV110

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×