USE OF PEGINTERFERON ALFA-2B IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS C PATIENTS FAILING PRIOR THERAPY- A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Maria Buti, MD, Head Oncology1, Amy K O'Sullivan, PhD, Associate Director2, Kelly Delong, BA, Research Associate2, Manishi Prasad, MPH, Director, Global Health Outcomes3, Francisco Javier Sabater, MS, Health Economics Manager4, Rafael Esteban, MD, Professor1, Milton C. Weinstein, PhD, Professor51Hospital General Universitario Valle de Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain; 2 i3 Innovus, Medford, MA, USA; 3 Schering-Plough Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ, USA; 4 Schering-Plough S.A, Alcobendas, Spain; 5 Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2b (1.5 mcg/kg/wk) plus 800-1400 mg/day ribavirin (PEG2b 1.5/R) in patients with refractory chronic hepatitis C (HCV) whose previous combination therapy with pegylated or standard interferon alfa and ribavirin failed. METHODS: A Markov model was developed based on an open-label trial (EPIC) in which patients received PEG2b 1.5/R or no further drug therapy. Patients with genotypes 1/4 (G1/4) HCV with undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 were treated for 48 weeks; patients with detectable HCV RNA were discontinued at 18 weeks. G2/3 HCV patients were treated for 24 weeks. Data on the natural history of disease, drug and medical resource costs (2007 euros), and utility values were estimated from published literature. Using a Spanish perspective, the model estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for PEG2b 1.5/R vs. no further treatment based on cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained over a patient’s lifetime. A second-order probabilistic Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effects of parameter uncertainty (efficacy) on the study findings. RESULTS: In G1 and G4 patients, PEG2b 1.5/R led to higher costs (€19,300 vs. €10,100) and increased QALYs (10.62 vs. 10.15) compared with no drug therapy (ICER: €19,600 per QALY gained). In G2/3 patients, treatment costs were twice as high for the PEG2b 1.5/R regimen compared with no therapy (€22,200 vs. €10,100); the incremental gain in QALYs was greater than it was for the G1 and G4 groups (11.99 vs. 10.15) (ICER: €6,600 per QALY gained). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggests a 99% probability that the ICER for PEG2b 1.5/R among refractory patients is at or below a €30,000 per QALY gained threshold for both genotype groups. CONCLUSIONS: PEG2b 1.5/R is in the range of the widely accepted cost-effectiveness threshold for medical interventions in Spain.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-11, ISPOR Europe 2008, Athens, Greece

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 6 (November 2008)

Code

PIN28

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×