MODELING THE LONG-TERM COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CRONIC HEP. B THERAPIES IN SPAIN

Author(s)

Max Brosa, MSC, Director1, Maria Buti, MD, Head Oncology2, Miguel Angel Casado, MS, PhD, Director3, Magdalena Rueda, MSC, PhD, Medical Project Manager4, Rafael Esteban, MD, Professor51Oblikue Consulting, Barcelona, SC, Spain; 2 Hospital General Universitario Valle de Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain; 3 Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia, Madrid, Spain; 4 Gilead Sciences, Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 5 Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of available treatments for CHB in  HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive patients in Spain. METHODS: A Markov model was used to project, over the next 30 years, the HBV-related complications and future costs of consecutive cohorts of CHB patients in Spain treated with adefovir, entecavir, lamivudine, pegylated interferon, telvibudine and tenofovir. A second line combination therapy (lamivudine+adefovir) was assigned for patients resistant to any first-line oral antiviral option, whilst patients not responding to oral treatments where assumed to discontinue therapy and experience the risk of disease complications, as described by the natural history of CHB. Patients not responding to pegylated interferon were assumed to start an oral treatment –tenofovir or entecavir- with corresponding costs and effects. The probabilities of disease progression were based on HBV-DNA levels for each treatment option in the model and were obtained from data published in the literature. Disease and complications costs were based on the healthcare payer perspective at a local level (the Spanish National Health System). An annual 3% discount rate was applied to future costs and outcomes (quality adjusted life years – QALY). RESULTS: The higher rate of patients with undetectable HBV-DNA with tenofovir translated to its higher effectiveness in terms of QALY, followed by pegylated interferon, entecavir, telbivudine, lamivudine and adefovir in HBeAg-positive patients and pegylated interferon, entecavir, telbivudine, adefovir and lamivudine in HBeAg-negative patients. Tenofovir presented higher effectiveness and lower costs than entecavir and telbivudine in HBeAg-negative patients (besides pegylated interferon in HBeAg-positive patients), and cost-effectiveness ratios with respect to the rest of therapies far below the common reference efficiency threshold of €30,000 per QALY in Spain. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic HBV infected patients, tenofovir is a cost-effective or even a dominant (lower cost and (higher efficacy) strategy in comparison to the rest of available therapies for CHB in Spain.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-11, ISPOR Europe 2008, Athens, Greece

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 6 (November 2008)

Code

PGI12

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Gastrointestinal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×