MEASUREMENT AND RATES OF ADHERENCE TO BIOLOGICS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Author(s)

Jalpa A. Doshi, PhD, Research Assistant Professor of Medicine, Michelle M. Kim, MSc, PhD Student, Jennifer Pahira, BA, candidate, UndergraduateUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES:Biological treatments have been promising advances for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Poor adherence and treatment discontinuation, however, may undermine therapeutic benefits and raise concerns given the high costs of these agents. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the methods used to measure adherence to biologics and to identify previously reported biologic adherence rates among RA patients. METHODS:A MEDLINE search was performed from 1995 to 2007 using the following search terms: adherence, compliance, discontinuation, treatment retention, RA, and biologics (e.g. infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab). Additional studies were obtained from references of the identified articles. Two study investigators independently reviewed the articles to determine relevant studies and extracted information such as study objective, adherence measure, mode of measurement, and main findings in a standardized form. RESULTS:Seven of 508 articles met the inclusion criteria. Adherence was measured through prospective cohort studies (N=3), retrospective analysis of registries (N=2) or claims databases (N=2). Five of the seven studies were based in Europe and the remainder in the U.S. Adherence measures reported included medication possession ratios ([MPR], N=2) and discontinuation rates based on physician interviews (N=4) or patient self-reports (N=1). Of studies reporting MPRs, 50% to 80% of patients had a MPR≥0.80 during the course of therapy. Studies measuring discontinuation found the percentage of patients continuing therapy to range from 45% to 79% after one year of monotherapy. Adherence rates decreased in subsequent years of treatment. Combination with methotrexate or other oral RA drugs was associated with higher (N=2) and lower (N=2) adherence rates. CONCLUSIONS:Few studies have measured adherence to biologics among RA patients; however, most find adherence to such agents is suboptimal. Methods of adherence measurement varied greatly across studies. Standardized methods to measure and track adherence to biologics are needed as their use continues to increase.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2008-11, ISPOR Europe 2008, Athens, Greece

Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 6 (November 2008)

Code

AR4

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×