COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF A HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINE IN REDUCING THE RISK OF CERVICAL CANCER IN IRELAND USING A TRANSMISSION DYNAMIC MODEL
Author(s)
Cara Usher, BSc, PhD, Senior Scientist1, Lesley Tilson, BScPharm, PhD, Chief I Pharmacist1, Jens Olsen, MSc(Econ), Programme Manager2, Martin Rudbeck Jepsen, MSc, PhD, Senior Scientist3, Cathal Walsh, MA, PhD, Biostatistician4, Michael Barry, MD, PhD, Clinical Director (NCPE) Senior Lecturer in Clinical Pharmacology (TCD)11National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Dublin, Ireland; 2 University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 3 Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark; 4 Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a combined primary (vaccination against HPV types 16 and 18) and secondary (population-based cervical cancer screening programme) approach to managing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 1-3 and cervical cancer compared to a cervical cancer screening programme alone in the Irish health care setting. METHODS: The economic analysis was conducted using an independently developed dynamic agent based model [1], which takes account of the herd immunity effect of the vaccine. The study comparator was a population based cervical cancer screening programme. Irish epidemiological and cost data were incorporated into the model. The analysis was performed from the Irish health system perspective with a time horizon of 70 years. The cost-effectiveness of a range of catch-up vaccination strategies were also evaluated. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A one way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted. RESULTS: The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €17,383/LYG. The ICER for the 12-15 year old catch-up programme was €52,968/LYG. The key determinants of cost effectiveness were vaccine efficacy, vaccine costs (including administration costs), duration of protection (i.e. requirement for booster) and the discount rate. Using a probabilistic sensitivity analysis about the base case, the 95% CI for cost per LYG was (€9,658, €24,097). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this HTA suggest that vaccination against HPV types 16 and 18 would be cost-effective from the perspective of the Irish health care payer. Universal vaccination of 12 year old females, against HPV types 16 and 18, can be recommended as a cost-effective intervention in the Irish health care setting. In relation to a catch-up programme, vaccination of 12 to 15 year old females in the first year of the programme would be the most cost-effective catch-up strategy. [1] Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment (DACEHTA). Reduction in the risk of cervical cancer by vaccination against HPV – a health technology assessment. Health Technology Assessment 2007;9.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2008-11, ISPOR Europe 2008, Athens, Greece
Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 6 (November 2008)
Code
CN6
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic