Identifying Factors Underlying Variation in the Cost of Acetabular Labral Repair or Debridement during Hip Arthroscopy: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis
Author(s)
Dean M1, Etges AP2, Cherian NJ3, Dowley K4, LaPorte ZL3, Torabian K3, Eberlin C5, Best MJ6, Martin SD3
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Avant-garde Health, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, South Boston, MA, USA, 5Massachusetts General Hospital, PEORIA, IL, USA, 6Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
Leveraging time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC), this study aims to (1) quantify the cost of arthroscopic acetabular labral repair or debridement and (2) explore variation in costs based on patient-specific characteristics, operative techniques employed, and surgical settings.METHODS:
Using TDABC, we calculated the cost of care for 890 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy by five surgeons at four surgery centers within a single institution from 2015-2022. Costs were normalized to protect confidentiality. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models were utilized to identify factors underlying variation in costs.RESULTS:
The normalized total cost of arthroscopic acetabular labral repair or debridement ranged from 43.4 to 203.7 (mean ± standard deviation: 100 ± 24.2), with a 1.8-fold variation in costs between patients in the 10th and 90th percentile. On average, supply costs accounted for 48.8% of total costs, while labor costs comprised the remaining 51.2%. Higher costs were significantly associated with male gender (3.9-point increase, p<0.001), labral repair relative to debridement (22.4-point increase, p<0.001), and operative year (0.62-point increase per year, p=0.023). Additionally, significant variations in cost were found in relation to osteoplasty type, treatment of cartilage lesions, provider team, and capsular management (p<0.001 for all). Age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were not independently associated with costs. A mixed-effects model incorporating these factors as fixed effects and the surgeon and surgery center as random effects explained 88.7% of the observed cost variation; 81.7% of this explanatory power was derived from the surgeon and surgery center.CONCLUSIONS:
Variation in the cost of outpatient hip arthroscopy was primarily explained by surgeon and surgery center. Case-specific characteristics were also significantly associated with costs, while patient demographics contributed minimal variability. These insights may support physicians, payers, and other stakeholders to contain costs, implement bundled reimbursement structures, and deliver higher-value care.Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
EE28
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas