Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) and Costs in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (MUC) Who Received First-Line (1L) Treatment: Results from Impact UC II
Author(s)
Bilen MA1, Diessner B2, White J2, Kirker M3, Liu F4, Nguyen A5, Gharibian N3, Devgan G3, Katzenstein H4, Bhanegaonkar A4
1Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 3Pfizer, New York, NY, USA, 4EMD Serono, Rockland, MA, USA, 5Optum, Apple Valley, MN, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Recent drug approvals have changed the treatment landscape for mUC; however, real-world data on HCRU and costs are limited. Here, we describe HCRU and costs by 1L treatment in mUC.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis used the Optum Research Database, comprising claims data from ≈8% of US commercially enrolled and 18% of Medicare Advantage populations. Patients were diagnosed with mUC from July 2015 to June 2020 (index date = first claim) with continuous enrollment for 6 months before and ≥6 months after index date. Patients were followed until disenrollment, study end (August 2021), or death. Treatment was categorized as IO monotherapy, cisplatin-based, carboplatin-based, or other. Analyses examined unadjusted all-cause HCRU and costs by treatment and were reported per 100 patients per month (PHPPM) or per patient per month (PPPM).
RESULTS: Of 3006 patients, 1229 (40.9%) received ≥1L treatment. Among treated patients, mean (SD) age was 72.6 (9.8) years, 71.9% were male, and 78.7% had Medicare Advantage. 1L treatment was platinum-based chemotherapy in 57.1% (29.7% cisplatin-based, 27.4% carboplatin-based), IO monotherapy in 27.3%, and other in 15.6%. Median (IQR) number of inpatient (IP) stays and emergency department (ED) visits PHPPM were highest with IO monotherapy (IP stays, 15.08 [3.03-35.71]; ED visits, 26.79 [8.19-61.22]), followed by carboplatin-based (IP stays, 14.08 [5.86-28.04]; ED visits, 22.86 [8.96-53.10]), and cisplatin-based (IP stays, 10.21 [3.49-24.19]; ED visits, 13.70 [4.85-33.04]) treatment. IO monotherapy had the highest median (IQR) healthcare costs PPPM ($12,374.60 [$8,012.03-$17,412.46]), followed by cisplatin-based ($9,544.75; [$5,196.71-$17,947.72]) and carboplatin-based ($8,989.08; [$5,476.20-$13,707.88]) treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates, prior to avelumab 1L maintenance approval, ~60% of patients never received anticancer treatment following mUC diagnosis. Among treated patients, HCRU and costs were highest for IO monotherapy followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Future research should evaluate reasons for lack of treatment and assess HCRU and costs by treatment sequences including avelumab 1LM.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
EE390
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology