Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pd-L1 Testing Associated with Pembrolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC in China
Author(s)
Wu Y1, Tao L2, Chang L3, Wang F4, Sun S2, Hong S5
1Center for Health Policy and Technology Assessment, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 11, China, 2Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China, 3Institute of Health Policy & Technology Assessment, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, China, 4Beijing Medical and Health Economic Research Association, Beijing, China, 5Agilent Technologies, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of PD-L1 testing associated with Pembrolizumab for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.
METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PD-L1 testing in guiding treatment with Pembrolizumab compared to no PD-L1 testing. In the PD-L1 testing group, patients were stratified by PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%, 1-49%, or <1% and received Pembrolizumab monotherapy, Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone, respectively. In the non-PD-L1 testing group, all patients received Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Clinical outcomes were derived from two published randomized trials, KEYNOTE-042 Chinese cohort study and KEYNOTE-189. Direct medical costs and utilities were derived from published literature and a healthcare price database. Costs and outcomes were estimated over a lifetime horizon and discounted at 5% annually. The net monetary benefit (NMB) was estimated for the PD-L1 testing group versus the non-PD-L1 testing group. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results. One scenario explored a price reduction for Pembrolizumab, consistent with available patient assistance programs and the other scenario modified the PD-L1 testing group so that patients with PD-L1 TPS <1% received Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, in accordance with new clinical guidelines in China.
RESULTS: Using PD-L1 testing to guide treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC led to cost savings of $53,914.71 and a reduction in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.234, resulting in a positive NMB of $50,973.98 at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $12,551.50/QALY (GDP per capita in China, 2021). Findings were robust across sensitivity and scenario analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that using PD-L1 testing to guide first-line Pembrolizumab treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC is a cost-effective strategy at a WTP threshold of $12,551.50/QALY for China.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
EE303
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies, Methodological & Statistical Research
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Diagnostics & Imaging
Disease
Biologics & Biosimilars, Drugs, Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory)
Explore Related HEOR by Topic